首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) >Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise
【24h】

Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise

机译:中国经济崛起中的政策试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Policy experimentation is frequently highlighted as a potent means to facilitate institutional innovation, and avoid reformist leaps in the dark by injecting bottom-up initiative and local knowledge into the national policy process. Yet experimentation remains a surprisingly vague concept in the debate over variants of economic governance. This article contributes to the study of experiment-based policymaking by examining the distinctive tools, processes, and effects of experimental programs in major domains of China’s economic reform. China’s experience attests to the potency of experimentation in bringing about transformative change, even in a rigid authoritarian, bureaucratic environment, and regardless of strong political opposition. Large-scale experimentation stimulated policy learning and economic expansion effectively in those sectors in which political elites could benefit from supporting new types of private and transnational entrepreneurial activity. Conversely, experimental programs largely failed in generating an effective provision of social goods which would require a combination of active societal supervision and strict central government enforcement to make it work. Though the impact of reform experiments varies between policy domains, China’s experimentation-based policy process has been essential to redefining basic policy parameters. At the heart of this process, we find a pattern of central–local interaction in generating policy—“experimentation under hierarchy”—which constitutes a notable addition to the repertoires of governance that have been tried for achieving economic transformation.
机译:经常强调政策试验是促进体制创新的有效手段,并通过将自下而上的倡议和地方知识注入国家政策进程来避免改革派在黑暗中飞跃。然而,在关于经济治理形式的辩论中,实验仍然是一个令人惊讶的模糊概念。本文通过考察中国经济改革主要领域中实验工具的独特工具,过程和效果,为基于实验的政策制定研究做出了贡献。中国的经验证明,即使在僵化的威权主义,官僚主义的环境中,无论有否强烈的政治反对,实验都可能带来变革。在那些政治精英可以从支持新型私人和跨国企业家活动中受益的领域中,大规模试验有效地刺激了政策学习和经济扩张。相反,实验性计划在很大程度上未能产生有效的社会产品,而这需要积极的社会监督和严格的中央政府执法相结合才能使其发挥作用。尽管改革实验的影响因政策领域而异,但中国基于实验的政策流程对于重新定义基本政策参数至关重要。在此过程的核心,我们发现了制定政策的“中央-地方”互动模式-“等级制下的实验”,这是为实现经济转型而尝试的治理体系的显着补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号