...
首页> 外文期刊>Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization >Further study on efficiency of sequential approximate programming for probabilistic structural design optimization
【24h】

Further study on efficiency of sequential approximate programming for probabilistic structural design optimization

机译:对概率结构设计优化的顺序逼近编程效率的进一步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Compared to the traditional deterministic optimization based on safety factors, the probabilistic structural design optimization (PSDO) is considered to be a more rational design philosophy because of reasonable account of uncertainties in material properties, loading, boundary condition and geometry, and even mathematical representation of the system model. However, it is well known that the computation for PSDO can be prohibitive when the associated function evaluation is expensive. As a result, many approximate PSDO methods have been developed in recent literatures. In previous works, we developed two sequential approximate programming (SAP) strategies for PSDO based on reliability index approach (RIA) and performance measure approach (PMA). In PMA with SAP, a sequence of approximate programming of PSDO was formulated and solved before the final optimum was located. In each subprogramming, rather than relying on direct linear Taylor expansion of the probabilistic performance measure (PPM), we developed a formulation for approximate PPM at the current design point and used its linearization instead. The approximate PPM and its sensitivity were obtained by approximating the optimality conditions in the vicinity of the minimum performance target point (MPTP). The present paper further elaborates the SAP for PMA. In addition to detailed description of the algorithm, we present error analysis and show that in the ?-vicinity of optimum design and corresponding MPTP, the difference between the Taylor expansion of PPM and the linear expansion of approximate PPM is of higher order of ?. Four examples are optimized by six algorithms appearing in recent literatures for efficiency comparison. The effect of target reliability index and statistical distribution of random variables on the comparison is discussed. The third example shows that PMA with SAP performs well even for the problem for which reliability index calculation by first order reliability method (FORM) fails. Finally, the fourth example with 144 probabilistic constraints is shown to demonstrate the effectiveness of PMA with SAP. All example results illustrate that with the algorithm PMA with SAP, we get concurrent convergence of both design optimization and probabilistic performance measure calculation, which agrees well with the error analysis.
机译:与传统的基于安全因素的确定性优化相比,概率结构设计优化(PSDO)被认为是更合理的设计理念,因为合理地考虑了材料特性,载荷,边界条件和几何形状以及数学上的不确定性。系统模型。然而,众所周知,当相关功能评估昂贵时,用于PSDO的计算可能会被禁止。结果,在最近的文献中已经开发了许多近似的PSDO方法。在以前的工作中,我们基于可靠性指标方法(RIA)和性能评估方法(PMA)为PSDO开发了两种顺序近似编程(SAP)策略。在具有SAP的PMA中,制定了PSDO的近似编程序列,并在确定最终最佳值之前对其进行了求解。在每个子程序中,我们不依赖于概率性能测度(PPM)的直接线性泰勒展开,而是为当前的设计点开发了近似PPM的公式,并使用其线性化方法。通过近似最小性能目标点(MPTP)附近的最佳条件,可以获得近似的PPM及其灵敏度。本文进一步阐述了用于PMA的SAP。除了对该算法的详细描述外,我们还进行了误差分析,并表明在最优设计的β邻域和相应的MPTP中,PPM的泰勒展开与近似PPM的线性展开之间的差异为α的高阶。最近的文献中出现了用于效率比较的六个算法,对四个示例进行了优化。讨论了目标可靠性指标和随机变量的统计分布对比较的影响。第三个示例表明,即使通过一阶可靠性方法(FORM)进行可靠性指标计算失败的问题,带有SAP的PMA仍然表现良好。最后,显示了具有144个概率约束的第四个示例,以证明PMA与SAP的有效性。所有示例结果都表明,使用带有SAP的PMA算法,我们可以同时进行设计优化和概率性能度量计算的收敛,这与误差分析非常吻合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号