首页> 外文期刊>Structural Design of Tall Buildings >EARTHQUAKE DAMAGEABILITY CRITERIA FOR DUE DILIGENCE INVESTIGATIONS
【24h】

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGEABILITY CRITERIA FOR DUE DILIGENCE INVESTIGATIONS

机译:尽职调查的地震损害标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Earthquake vulnerability is an important financial issue in evaluating the acceptability of a property as a security for a loan or for an equity position. Such analyses are usually performed as part of the due diligence assessment of the property. Probable loss (PL) and scenario loss (SL), for both design basis and maximum capable earthquakes, were assessed to determine their utility in damageability analyses. Evaluations were made for a range of building damageabilities and for 14 sites throughout the United States that are representative of seismic hazard from very high to low. Portfolios from one to 16 buildings are considered. The analysis indicates that none of the damageability criteria is sufficient to distinguish between good and bad buildings to be securities for loans or to be good risks for equity investment for general use throughout the United States. Scenario upper loss (SUL) and probable loss (PL) values are consistently very stringent criteria for individual buildings in moderate-risk and high-risk regions, while scenario expected loss (SEL) values are too lenient in moderate risk areas. PL and SUL criteria are much too stringent at the 20% threshold level to be used generally, except for a group of well-designed buildings. They can be acceptable if threshold values for acceptance are set to be above 20%. The SEL criterion is evaluated as not adequate to discriminate between good and bad damageability buildings by itself. It can work well in combination with a stability criterion so that buildings with poor predicted earthquake performance are eliminated based on stability, not damageability. It is recommended that combined criteria be used for fiduciary evaluation that includes both an assessment of the stability of the buildings and a damageability assessment to achieve a balanced, consistent evaluation of the suitability of the buildings as securities or as investments. Four alternative acceptance criteria are recommended for due diligence assessments. It is recommended that all due diligence reports include evaluations of scenario and probable losses for each building and the group so that they can enter into the decision process for the property.
机译:地震脆弱性是评估财产作为贷款或权益头寸的可接受性的重要财务问题。此类分析通常作为财产尽职评估的一部分进行。对设计基准地震和最大地震震级的可能损失(PL)和情景损失(SL)进行了评估,以确定它们在破坏性分析中的效用。对建筑物的各种破坏性以及美国范围内从极高到低代表地震危险的14个地点进行了评估。考虑从1到16座建筑物的投资组合。分析表明,在整个美国范围内,没有任何可破坏性标准足以区分好建筑物和坏建筑物是贷款的抵押品还是股票投资的良好风险。对于中等风险和高风险区域的单个建筑物,情景上限损失(SUL)和可能损失(PL)值始终是非常严格的标准,而在中等风险区域,情景预期损失(SEL)值过于宽松。 PL和SUL标准在20%阈值水平上过于严格,以致于通常无法使用,除了一组精心设计的建筑物。如果可接受的阈值设置为高于20%,则它们可以接受。 SEL标准被评估为不足以单独区分好坏建筑物。它可以与稳定性标准结合使用,因此可以根据稳定性而不是破坏性来消除预测地震性能较差的建筑物。建议将综合标准用于受托评估,其中包括对建筑物稳定性的评估和对建筑物的损坏性评估,以实现对建筑物作为证券或投资的适用性的平衡,一致的评估。建议使用四个替代验收标准进行尽职调查评估。建议所有尽职调查报告都包括对每个建筑物和每个组的方案和可能损失的评估,以便他们可以进入财产的决策过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号