首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Organization >Market-political ambidexterity during institutional transitions
【24h】

Market-political ambidexterity during institutional transitions

机译:制度变迁中的市场政治矛盾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why were foreign firms such as Shell in Russia, Ford in Brazil, and Huawei and ZTE in the United States frustrated? Why were domestic firms such as Tata in India also frustrated? Why were foreign firms such as Dell in Brazil and domestic firms such as Infosys in India maneuvered successfully during institutional transitions? While numerous answers can be entertained, we believe that market-political ambidexterity holds a key to answer these intriguing questions. Overall, the concept of market-political ambidexterity serves to counterbalance the impression-implicit or explicit-that 'markets have triumphed' during institutional transitions. In conclusion, if this article can contain only one message, we would like it to be a sense of the staggering power of the forces associated with both market competition and government influences during institutional transitions, and of firms' necessity to master skills in managing both sets of market-based and nonmarket-based competition simultaneously.
机译:为什么对俄罗斯的壳牌,巴西的福特,美国的华为和中兴等外国公司感到沮丧?为什么印度的Tata等国内公司也感到沮丧?在机构过渡期间,为什么巴西的戴尔等外国公司和印度的Infosys等国内公司成功地运转?尽管可以得出许多答案,但我们认为市场政治的灵活性是回答这些有趣问题的关键。总体而言,市场政治矛盾的概念可以抵消在体制转型期间“市场已经胜利”的内在印象或内在印象。总之,如果本文仅包含一条信息,我们希望它能体会到制度转型期间与市场竞争和政府影响相关的力量所具有的惊人力量,以及企业必须掌握同时管理这两种技能的能力同时进行基于市场和基于非市场的竞争。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Strategic Organization》 |2013年第2期|205-213|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China;

    Jindal School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell, SM 43, Richardson, TX 75080, USA;

    University of Texas at Dallas, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:30:10

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号