首页> 外文期刊>Strategic analysis >The Great Powers And The Sub-continent: A New Phase?
【24h】

The Great Powers And The Sub-continent: A New Phase?

机译:大国和次​​大陆:新阶段?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The emergence of Bangladesh as a sovereign independent republic and the manner in which it so emerged has radically altered the relative position of the Great Powers in South Asia. The change has been particularly remarkable for the two Super Powers, though the other three Great Powers also have been affected in one way or the other by the developments of 1971.rnIt is obvious that the Super Power which has gained immeasurably in both prestige and influence due to the events of last year is the Soviet Union. Russian policy towards the subcontinent had undergone many changes over the years. An early indifference to India and Pakistan yielded place to a strong pro-India policy in the mid-1950s and before the decade was over the Soviet Union had emerged in most Indian eyes as the country's greatest friend. In the post-Khrushchev period, however, there were great anxieties in India about the twists and turns in Soviet policy and when it became known in the late 1960s that the Soviet Union was extending military assistance to Pakistan, India was greatly disturbed. Even before Tashkent, the Soviet Union had shown some interest in pursuing a policy of equal friendliness to India and Pakistan which was a distinct change from the earlier Soviet posture of full support to India in all Indo-Pakistani disputes. After Tashkent, the Soviet Union saw itself as the peace-maker in the sub-continent and this necessitated a posture that caused some anxiety in India. It had got used to Soviet support and sympathy and any indication of Soviet neutrality created concern in New Delhi. Similarly, in regard to the Sino-Indian problems, the Soviet position has not always been welcome in New Delhi. Yet, notwithstanding these fluctuations in Soviet attitude and the zig-zag nature of the course it pursued, there was throughout a broad assumption underlying Soviet policies towards South Asia, that India was the key factor in the region and that any policy which created distrust and dissension between the two countries was to be avoided. Therefore, in substance, Soviet policy remained pro-Indian both in regard to the problems of Indo-Pakistani and Sino-Indian relations. Any Soviet role of either mediation or peace-making in the region was to be consistent with what India would at any point of time regard as its vital national interests.
机译:孟加拉国成为主权独立共和国,其出现方式从根本上改变了大国在南亚的相对地位。对于这两个超级大国而言,这一变化尤其显着,尽管其他三个大国也受到了1971年发展的一种或多种影响。显然,超级大国的声望和影响力都得到了不可估量的增长。由于去年的事件是苏联。多年来,俄罗斯对次大陆的政策发生了许多变化。在1950年代中期,对印度和巴基斯坦的冷漠态度促成了强有力的亲印度政策,在十年结束之前,苏联在大多数印度人眼中已成为该国最大的朋友。然而,在后赫鲁晓夫时期,印度对苏联政策的曲折充满忧虑。1960年代后期人们知道苏联向巴基斯坦提供军事援助时,印度受到了极大的困扰。甚至在塔什干之前,苏联对实行对印度和巴基斯坦平等友好的政策就表现出了一定的兴趣,这与早期苏联在所有印巴争端中全力支持印度的姿态发生了明显变化。在塔什干之后,苏联视自己为该次大陆的和平缔造者,这势必在印度引起某种焦虑。它已经习惯了苏联的支持和同情,任何表明苏联中立的迹象都在新德里引起了关注。同样,关于中印问题,苏联的立场在新德里并不总是受到欢迎。然而,尽管苏维埃态度上的这些波动以及它所采取的做法是曲折形的,但在苏维埃对南亚政策的基础上,人们一直有一个广泛的假设,即印度是该地区的关键因素,任何造成不信任和要避免两国之间的分歧。因此,就印巴关系和中印关系而言,无论从本质上讲,苏维埃政策都仍然是亲印度的。苏联在该地区的调停或建立和平的任何作用都应与印度在任何时候都将其视为至关重要的国家利益相一致。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Strategic analysis》 |2009年第1期|145-152|共8页
  • 作者

    Sisir Gupta;

  • 作者单位

    Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:47:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号