...
首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >Comparison of ensemble models for drought prediction based on climate indexes
【24h】

Comparison of ensemble models for drought prediction based on climate indexes

机译:基于气候指数的干旱预报总体模型比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Current drought studies have already used the concept of equal ensemble streamflow prediction, but lack other kinds of ensemble prediction models for comparison of drought probabilistic prediction. Therefore, in this paper, an equal ensemble drought prediction (EEDP) model, a weighted ensemble drought prediction (WEDP) model, and a conditional ensemble drought prediction (CEDP) model were established and elaborately compared for drought prediction. The EEDP model directly uses the concept of ensemble streamflow prediction and assigns an equal weight to each ensemble member. The WEDP model assigns weights to ensemble members given the similarity of climate indexes between the historical and forecast year. The CEDP model considers the climate information as predictors and generates conditional ensembles of drought given the climate indexes. The verification of the proposed models was carried out using 26 meteorological stations in Jiangxi province (China), using the standard precipitation index to depict meteorological drought conditions in October, November, and December. The results show that compared to the EEDP model, the WEDP and CEDP models remarkably improved the accuracy and reduced the uncertainty of the drought prediction, indicating that a model considering climate information is much better than a purely statistical model. Meanwhile, the CEDP model outperformed the WEDP model in parameter estimation and accuracy. The prediction in southern Jiangxi province gets the best results compared with other regions. Our results provide a basis for drought planning and management in Jiangxi province.
机译:当前的干旱研究已经使用了等值集合流预测的概念,但是缺乏其他类型的集合预测模型来比较干旱概率预测。因此,在本文中,建立了均等集合干旱预测(EEDP)模型,加权集合干旱预测(WEDP)模型和条件集合干旱预测(CEDP)模型,并对干旱预测进行了详细的比较。 EEDP模型直接使用集合流预测的概念,并为每个集合成员分配相等的权重。鉴于历史年份和预报年份之间的气候指数相似,WEDP模型为整体成员分配权重。 CEDP模型将气候信息视为预测因素,并在给定气候指数的情况下产生条件干旱。利用江西省(中国)的26个气象站对建议的模型进行了验证,使用标准降水指数来描述10月,11月和12月的气象干旱情况。结果表明,与EEDP模型相比,WEDP和CEDP模型显着提高了干旱预测的准确性,并减少了干旱预测的不确定性,这表明考虑气候信息的模型比纯统计模型要好得多。同时,CEDP模型在参数估计和准确性方面都优于WEDP模型。与其他地区相比,江西南部的预测结果最好。我们的结果为江西省的干旱规划和管理提供了依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号