...
首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >A non-traditional approach to the analysis of flood hazard for dams
【24h】

A non-traditional approach to the analysis of flood hazard for dams

机译:大坝洪水危害分析的非传统方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The traditional and still prevailing approach to characterization of flood hazards to dams is the inflow design flood (IDF). The IDF, defined either deterministically or probabilistically, is necessary for sizing a dam, its discharge facilities and reservoir storage. However, within the dam safety risk informed decision framework, the IDF does not carry much relevance, no matter how accurately it is characterized. In many cases, the probability of the reservoir inflow tells us little about the probability of dam overtopping. Typically, the reservoir inflow and its associated probability of occurrence is modified by the interplay of a number of factors (reservoir storage, reservoir operating rules and various operational faults and natural disturbances) on its way to becoming the reservoir outflow and corresponding peak level-the two parameters that represent hydrologic hazard acting upon the dam. To properly manage flood risk, it is essential to change approach to flood hazard analysis for dam safety from the currently prevailing focus on reservoir inflows and instead focus on reservoir outflows and corresponding reservoir levels. To demonstrate these points, this paper presents stochastic simulation of floods on a cascade system of three dams and shows progression from exceedance probabilities of reservoir inflow to exceedance probabilities of peak reservoir level depending on initial reservoir level, storage availability, reservoir operating rules and availability of discharge facilities on demand. The results show that the dam overtopping is more likely to be caused by a combination of a smaller flood and a system component failure than by an extreme flood on its own.
机译:表征大坝洪水危害的传统方法仍是流行的方法是流入设计洪水(IDF)。确定大小或概率确定的IDF对于确定水坝,其排放设施和水库的大小是必要的。但是,在大坝安全风险告知决策框架内,IDF不管其准确度如何,都没有太大的意义。在许多情况下,水库流入的可能性几乎没有告诉我们大坝翻倒的可能性。通常,在流入油藏的过程中,许多因素(油藏,油藏运行规则以及各种运行故障和自然干扰)之间的相互作用会改变油藏流入及其相关的发生概率,代表对大坝起作用的水文危害的两个参数。为了正确地管理洪水风险,必须改变目前大坝安全的洪水危害分析方法,从目前对水库流入的关注,而不是对水库流出和相应水库水位的关注。为了证明这些观点,本文对三座大坝的级联系统进行了洪水的随机模拟,并根据初始水库水位,储水量,储水库运行规则和储水量的可用性,显示了从水库入水的超标概率到水库水位峰值的超标概率的演变过程。按需排放设施。结果表明,大坝超调更可能是由较小的洪水和系统组件故障共同造成的,而不是由自身的极端洪水引起的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号