首页> 外文期刊>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment >Quantifying differences between reservoir inflows and dam site floods using frequency and risk analysis methods
【24h】

Quantifying differences between reservoir inflows and dam site floods using frequency and risk analysis methods

机译:使用频率和风险分析方法量化水库入库流量与坝址洪水之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Reservoirs are the most important constructions for water resources management and flood control. Great concern has been paid to the effects of reservoir on downstream area and the differences between inflows and dam site floods due to the changes of upstream flow generation and concentration conditions after reservoir's impoundment. These differences result in inconsistency between inflow quantiles and the reservoir design criteria derived by dam site flood series, which can be a potential risk and must be quantificationally evaluated. In this study, flood frequency analysis (FFA) and flood control risk analysis (FCRA) methods are used with the long reservoir inflow series derived from a multiple inputs and single output model and a copula-based inflow estimation model. The results of FFA and FCRA are compared and the influences on reservoir flood management are also discussed. The Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) in China is selected as a case study. Results show that the differences between the TGR inflow and dam site floods are significant which result in changes on its flood control risk rates. The mean values of TGR's annual maximum inflow peak discharge and 3 days flood volume have increased 5.58 and 3.85% than the dam site ones, while declined by 1.82 and 1.72% for the annual maximum 7 and 15 days flood volumes. The flood control risk rates of middle and small flood events are increased while extreme flood events are declined. It is shown that the TGR can satisfy the flood control task under current hydrologic regime and the results can offer references for better management of the TGR.
机译:水库是水资源管理和防洪最重要的建设。由于水库蓄水后上游水流的产生和集中条件的变化,水库对下游地区的影响以及流入量与坝址洪水之间的差异引起了人们的高度关注。这些差异导致流入分位数与通过坝址洪水序列得出的水库设计标准不一致,这可能是潜在风险,必须进行量化评估。在这项研究中,洪水频率分析(FFA)和洪水控制风险分析(FCRA)方法与从多个输入和单个输出模型以及基于copula的入库估算模型得出的长水库入库流量序列一起使用。比较了FFA和FCRA的结果,并讨论了其对水库洪水管理的影响。以中国的三峡水库(TGR)为案例研究。结果表明,TGR流量与坝址洪水之间的差异很大,从而导致其防洪风险率发生变化。 TGR的年最大入洪高峰流量和3天洪水量的平均值比坝址的平均值增加了5.58和3.85%,而年最大7天和15天的洪水量则分别下降了1.82和1.72%。中小洪水事件的防洪风险率增加,而极端洪水事件的减少。结果表明,三峡工程可以满足当前水文形势下的防洪任务,研究结果可为三峡工程的更好管理提供参考。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Wuhan Univ, Hubei Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Water Resources, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China;

    Wuhan Univ, Hubei Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Water Resources, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China;

    Wuhan Univ, Hubei Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Water Resources, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China;

    China Yangtze Power Co Ltd, Yichang 443000, Peoples R China;

    Wuhan Univ, Hubei Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Water Resources, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Design flood; Inflow flood; Dam site flood; Hydrologic change; Three Gorges Reservoir;

    机译:设计洪水;入库洪水;坝址洪水;水文变化;三峡水库;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号