...
首页> 外文期刊>Statistical science >Stochastic Approximation and Modern Model-Based Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials
【24h】

Stochastic Approximation and Modern Model-Based Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials

机译:随机近似和基于现代模型的剂量发现临床试验设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In 1951 Robbins and Monro published the seminal article on stochastic approximation and made a specific reference to its application to the "estimation of a quantal using response, nonresponse data." Since the 1990s, statistical methodology for dose-finding studies has grown into an active area of research. The dose-finding problem is at its core a percentile estimation problem and is in line with what the Robbins-Monro method sets out to solve. In this light, it is quite surprising that the dose-finding literature has developed rather independently of the older stochastic approximation literature. The fact that stochastic approximation has seldom been used in actual clinical studies stands in stark contrast with its constant application in engineering and finance. In this article, I explore similarities and differences between the dose-finding and the stochastic approximation literatures. This review also sheds light on the present and future relevance of stochastic approximation to dose-finding clinical trials. Such connections will in turn steer dose-finding methodology on a rigorous course and extend its ability to handle increasingly complex clinical situations.
机译:1951年,罗宾斯(Robins)和门罗(Monro)发表了关于随机逼近的开创性文章,并特别提及了它在“使用响应,非响应数据的量子估算”中的应用。自1990年代以来,用于剂量研究的统计方法已发展成为一个活跃的研究领域。剂量寻找问题的核心是百分位数估计问题,与Robbins-Monro方法着手解决的问题一致。有鉴于此,令人惊讶的是剂量寻找文献的发展与早期的随机近似文献无关。随机逼近在实际临床研究中很少使用的事实与其在工程和金融领域的不断应用形成鲜明对比。在本文中,我探讨了剂量寻找和随机近似文献之间的异同。这篇综述还阐明了随机近似与剂量寻找临床试验的当前和未来相关性。这样的联系将依次引导严格的剂量寻找方法,并扩展其处理日益复杂的临床情况的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号