首页> 外文期刊>State Telephone Regulation Report >10th Circuit Questions FCC Deference, Inducements Versus Ultimatums, in Challenge to CAF Order
【24h】

10th Circuit Questions FCC Deference, Inducements Versus Ultimatums, in Challenge to CAF Order

机译:第十巡回赛质疑FCC的尊敬,诱导与最后通,,挑战CAF秩序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

DENVER — Judges seemed generally receptive Nov. 19 tonFCC arguments that the agency acted reasonably when it implementednits landmark 2011 Connect America Fund order. The 10thnU.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel spent several hours hearingnchallenges to the order, which rewrote the $4.5 billion USF and setnintercarrier compensation on a path toward bill-and-keep. Asnjudges told challengers that ambiguous terms in the Telecom Actnshould be resolved in favor of reasonable FCC interpretation, challengersnresponded either that the terms weren’t ambiguous or theninterpretation wasn’t reasonable.
机译:丹佛—法官似乎普遍接受11月19日tonFCC的论点,即该机构在实施具有里程碑意义的2011年“连通美国基金”命令时表现合理。第十届美国巡回上诉法院小组花了几个小时审理对该命令的质疑,该命令改写了45亿美元的USF并确定了承运人的赔偿金,以求结账。 Asnjudges告诉挑战者,应该通过合理的FCC解释来解决《电信法案》中的歧义术语,挑战者回答说这些术语不是模棱两可,或者解释是不合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号