首页> 外文期刊>Stapp Car Crash Journal >Protection of Rear Seat Occupants in Frontal Crashes, Controlling for Occupant and Crash Characteristics
【24h】

Protection of Rear Seat Occupants in Frontal Crashes, Controlling for Occupant and Crash Characteristics

机译:在正面碰撞中保护后座乘员,控制乘员和碰撞特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, the level of protection offered to rear seat occupants in frontal crashes is investigated. The Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and National Automotive Sampling System Crashworthiness Data System (NASS CDS) databases were used for the analyses. The investigation focused on: 1- estimating the fatality protection effectiveness of the rear seat position relative to the right front seat position, using the double paired comparison method, 2- evaluating the effect of control group selection method on effectiveness predictions, and 3- identifying trends in rear seat occupant protection over model years of vehicles. By applying a uniform control group to the double paired comparison analysis of FARS data, this study suggests that all ages of occupants are safer in the rear seat than in the right front seat. Effectiveness estimates ranged from 5.9% to 82% for different age groups of occupants. Results indicate that although occupants overall benefit from sitting in the rear seat compared to the right front seat, for all model year vehicles, the protective effect of the rear seat relative to that of the right front seat has decreased in the newer model year vehicles. The reduction in the effectiveness was 43.7% for unbelted occupants and 33.5% for belted occupants. Logistic regression analysis on NASS CDS data shows that vehicle model year has a significant effect (p-value = 0.0043) on increasing the risk of injury for belted rear seat occupants. Considering these results, protection of rear seat occupants deserves more attention from the automotive industry and government agencies. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:在这项研究中,研究了在正面碰撞中为后座乘员提供的防护等级。死亡分析报告系统(FARS)和国家汽车采样系统耐撞性数据系统(NASS CDS)数据库用于分析。该调查的重点是:1-使用双配对比较方法估计后座位置相对于右前座位置的死亡保护有效性; 2-评估对照组选择方法对有效性预测的影响;以及3-确定在车型年期间后座乘员保护的趋势。通过将统一的对照组应用于FARS数据的双配对比较分析,这项研究表明,后座的所有年龄段的乘员比右前座的乘员更安全。对于不同年龄段的乘员,有效性估计为5.9%至82%。结果表明,尽管与右前排座椅相比,坐在后排座椅上的乘客总体上受益,但对于所有车型年份的汽车,后排座椅相对于右前排座椅的保护作用在新型车型中有所降低。对于未系安全带的乘员,有效性降低为43.7%,对于安全带乘员的有效性降低为33.5%。对NASS CDS数据进行的Logistic回归分析表明,车辆型号年份对增加安全带后座乘员的伤害风险有重大影响(p值= 0.0043)。考虑到这些结果,后座乘客的保护值得汽车行业和政府机构更多的关注。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Stapp Car Crash Journal》 |2009年第1期|p.75-91|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Elham Sahraei a, Damoon Soudbakhsh b, Kennerly Digges aThe George Washington University (a National Crash Analysis Center, b Center for Intelligent Systems Research),20101 Academic Way, Ashbum, VA 20147 USAAddress correspondence to Elham Sahraei, National Crash Analysis Center, 20101 Academic Way, Ashbum, VA 20147. Electronic mail: elham@ncac.gwu.edu;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号