首页> 外文期刊>Space Weather >Testing the empirical shock arrival model using quadrature observations
【24h】

Testing the empirical shock arrival model using quadrature observations

机译:使用正交观测测试经验冲击到达模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The empirical shock arrival (ESA) model was developed based on quadrature data from Helios (in situ) and P-78 (remote sensing) to predict the Sun-Earth travel time of coronal mass ejections (CMEs). The ESA model requires earthward CME speed as input, which is not directly measurable from coronagraphs along the Sun-Earth line. The Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) and the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) were in quadrature during 2010–2012, so the speeds of Earth-directed CMEs were observed with minimal projection effects. We identified a set of 20 full halo CMEs in the field of view of SOHO that were also observed in quadrature by STEREO. We used the earthward speed from STEREO measurements as input to the ESA model and compared the resulting travel times with the observed ones from L1 monitors. We find that the model predicts the CME travel time within about 7.3 h, which is similar to the predictions by the ENLIL model. We also find that CME-CME and CME-coronal hole interaction can lead to large deviations from model predictions.
机译:基于来自Helios(原位)和P-78(远程感应)的正交数据,开发了经验冲击到达(ESA)模型,以预测日冕物质抛射(CME)的太阳地球传播时间。 ESA模型需要将地面CME速度作为输入,而这不能直接通过沿日地线的日冕仪进行测量。在2010-2012年期间,太阳地面关系天文台(STEREO)和太阳与太阳圈天文台(SOHO)呈正交关系,因此,观测到的地球定向CME的速度具有最小的投影效应。我们在SOHO的视野中确定了一组20个完整的CME,它们也被STEREO正交观察到。我们将STEREO测量的地球速度作为ESA模型的输入,并将得出的行程时间与L1监视器的观测行程时间进行了比较。我们发现该模型可以预测7.3小时内的CME行驶时间,这与ENLIL模型的预测相似。我们还发现,CME-CME和CME-冠状孔的相互作用可能导致与模型预测的较大偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号