...
首页> 外文期刊>Soil Science Society of America Journal >Comparison of Redox Indicators in a Paddy Soil during Rice-Growing Season
【24h】

Comparison of Redox Indicators in a Paddy Soil during Rice-Growing Season

机译:水稻生育期水稻土中氧化还原指标的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare three methods of evaluating redox status, i.e., conventional redox potential (EH) measurement, terminal electron-accepting processes (TEAPs) and oxidative capacity (OXC) in pore waters of a paddy soil during the rice-growing season. The redox potential can be measured readily which can monitor progressive development of reducing conditions and distinguish oxic from anoxic conditions but with little information on specific redox processes under anoxic conditions. Identifying dominant TEAPs requires intensive data collection and analysis. The sequence of TEAPs development basically followed theoretical predictions but overlapping, typically among Mn, Fe, SO2-4-S reductions and methane production, was featured throughout the season. The measured dissolved H2 gas as the intermediate product, reflected the overlap among electron acceptors. Oxidative capacity integrated all the major oxidized and reduced species to a single conservative parameter and showed clearly the progressive redox status from oxic to postoxic and then to sulfidic conditions in the paddies with no apparent methanic condition during this particular growing season. In OXC computations, a more reliable method to estimate Mn and Fe oxyhydroxide concentrations as electron acceptors needs further testing. The measured EH showed a higher correlation to redox species Mn(II), Fe(II) and methane concentrations (r2 = 0.76, 0.73, and 0.76, respectively) than to dissolved O2 (DO), NO-3-N, and SO2-4-S (r2 = 0.53, 0.37, and 0.16, respectively). Measured EH was also highly correlated to OXC for low sulfate solutions. The three methods for evaluating redox status all indicated that more reducing conditions were developed in straw-incorporated paddies than that with straw-burned.
机译:本研究的目的是比较 评估氧化还原状态的三种方法,即常规氧化还原电势 (E H )测量,末端电子水稻生长期稻田土壤 和氧化能力(OXC)的过程。氧化还原电位可以很容易地进行测量,可以监测还原条件的进展情况,并区分有氧和无氧条件,但是在某些特定的氧化还原过程中只有 信息在缺氧 条件下。识别主要的TEAP需要进行大量的数据 收集和分析。技经评估组发展的顺序基本上是 ,遵循理论预测,但在Mn,Fe,SO 2- 4 中通常重叠,通常 。 -S的减少和甲烷的产生,在整个季节都有 。测得的作为中间产物的溶解的H 2 gas 反映了电子 受体之间的重叠。氧化能力将所有主要氧化的 和还原的物种整合到一个保守的参数,并清楚地显示 从有氧到正毒以及从 然后到在这个特定的生长季节,稻田中没有明显的 甲烷病状态。在 OXC计算中,估计更可靠的方法是估算作为电子受体的Mn和 Fe羟基氧化物的浓度,需要进一步的 测试。测得的E H 与氧化还原 物种Mn(II),Fe(II)和甲烷浓度具有更高的相关性(r 2 = 0.76, 0.73和0.76)分别比溶解的O 2 (DO),NO - 3 -N, 和SO 2- 4 -S(r 2 分别为0.53、0.37和0.16)。对于低硫酸盐溶液,测得的 E H 也与OXC高度相关。 三种评估氧化还原状态的方法均表示为 与秸秆焚烧相比,掺稻草的 稻田产生了更多的还原条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号