首页> 外文期刊>Sociological Inquiry >Choosing Childlessness: Weber's Typology of Action and Motives of the Voluntarily Childless
【24h】

Choosing Childlessness: Weber's Typology of Action and Motives of the Voluntarily Childless

机译:选择无子女:韦伯的自愿无子女行动和动机类型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

There has been little in-depth theoretical study in sociology of the motives of women and men who are childless by choice. This article begins to remedy this deficiency by analyzing the motives articulated by twenty-three childless women and men using Weber's typology of social action and distinction between primary and end motives. In-depth interview and focus group data reveal that, compared to men, women more often were affected by the parenting models of significant others, saw parenting as conflicting with career and leisured identities, and claimed the lack of a "maternal instinct" or disinterest in children as dominant influences. Men more explicitly than women rejected parenthood because of its perceived sacrifices, including financial expense. Both women and men were motivated by personality traits that they deemed incongruent with good parenting. Declared motives especially demonstrated instrumentally rational action in Weber's schema, although affectual and value-rational actions also were present. Respondent motives are compared to those that they, and empirical studies, have attributed to parents.
机译:对于选择生育无子女的男女动机的社会学研究很少进行深入的理论研究。本文通过使用韦伯的社会行动类型以及主要动机和最终动机之间的差异来分析二十三个无子女的妇女和男子所表达的动机,从而开始弥补这一缺陷。深入的访谈和焦点小组数据显示,与男性相比,女性更容易受到其他重要父母的养育模式的影响,将养育视为与职业和闲暇身份冲突,并声称缺乏“母性”或不感兴趣。在儿童中占主导地位。男人比女人更明确地拒绝父母,因为父母认为父母为此付出了牺牲,包括经济支出。男性和女性都受到性格特征的驱使,他们认为这种特征与养育子女不相称。既定的动机在韦伯的图式中尤其证明了工具上的理性行为,尽管也存在情感和价值理性行为。将受访者的动机与他们的动机以及实证研究归因于父母的动机进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号