首页> 外文期刊>Society and Business Review >Reconsidering community and the stranger in the age of virtuality
【24h】

Reconsidering community and the stranger in the age of virtuality

机译:重新考虑虚拟时代的社区和陌生人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – This question of community has always been a preoccupation for the human sciences and, indeed, is a practical concern for us everyday humans in our variety ways of being. As such a preoccupation with community traverses vast territories of intellectual discourse in philosophy, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and so forth. Recent developments in continental philosophy, innovations in information and communication technology and the emergence of “virtual” communities afford an opportunity to reconsider the meaning of community in what is believed to be a rather fundamental way. Virtual communities are often critiqued for being “thin” and “shallow” lacking the depth that local proximity in face-to-face communities brings. It is suggested that such a critique privileges a certain view of community premised upon shared values, or shared concerns, embedded in local situated face-to-face interaction and practices. The paper agues that such a view of community, based on categorical and physical proximity or sameness, can be problematised by a notion of community that is based on the ethical proximity of the stranger, the otherness of the Other. Design/methodology/approach – The paper draws upon Martin Heidegger, Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida. Findings – The paper demonstrates that community premised upon a categorical and physical proximity can be problematised by a conception of community based upon the ethical proximity of the stranger – the otherness of the Other. In developing this notion of community, the paper argues that communities always face an insider/outsider problematic that mirrors Levinas' tension between ethics and justice. Furthermore, the paper suggests that the continual working out of this problem, our ethical concern, is differently constituted in virtual communities and face-to-face communities. In particular, the paper draws attention to the importance of the encounter with the stranger in virtual environments. Originality/value – Contributes to debates on community by developing an ethical and political philosophy through which a shared sense of community can be rethought through the primacy of the Other.
机译:目的–这个社区问题一直是人类科学的头等大事,实际上,这是我们日常人类以各种存在方式所关心的现实问题。正因为如此,对社区的关注遍历了哲学,社会学,人类学,心理学等众多知识领域。大陆哲学的最新发展,信息和通信技术的创新以及“虚拟”社区的出现为人们提供了一种重新考虑社区意义的机会,人们认为这是一种相当基本的方式。虚拟社区经常被批评为“薄”和“浅”,缺乏面对面社区中本地接近带来的深度。有人建议,这种批评应优先考虑以共同价值观或共同关注为前提的某种社区观点,而这种共同价值观或共同关切是嵌入在本地面对面的互动和实践中的。该论文认为,基于分类和物理接近性或相同性的这种社区观点可能会受到基于陌生人的道德接近性,他人的另一性的社区概念的质疑。设计/方法论/方法–本文借鉴了马丁·海德格尔,伊曼纽尔·莱维纳斯和雅克·德里达。调查结果–该论文表明,以陌生人和其他人的道德接近性为基础的社区概念可能会质疑以分类和物理接近为前提的社区。在发展这种社区概念时,论文认为社区总是面临内在/外在的问题,这反映了列维纳斯在伦理与正义之间的张力。此外,该论文还提出,在虚拟社区和面对面社区中,解决我们的道德问题这一持续问题的方法有所不同。特别是,本文提请注意在虚拟环境中与陌生人相遇的重要性。原创性/价值–通过发展一种道德和政治哲学来促进关于社区的辩论,通过这种哲学和政治哲学,可以通过“他人”的主导来重新思考共同的社区意识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号