首页> 外文期刊>Society and Business Review >Sustainable development: a vague and ambiguous “theory”
【24h】

Sustainable development: a vague and ambiguous “theory”

机译:可持续发展:含糊不清的“理论”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The notion of “sustainable development” has had a short and tumultuous history, including a departure from economic reductionism by focusing on a multidimensional aspect and addressing the issues of its scope across many disciplines. It has become a project enabling a rethinking of capitalism based on the concept of a reformed type of capitalism. The purpose of this paper is to study this issue. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on the following arguments: the presentation of sustainable development as a “vague” theory, an empirical proof of this vagueness with regard to corporate actions whose justification is based around the notion of sustainable development, and finally the ambiguities of the notion. Findings – The notion of sustainable development raises the question of an apparent consensus on its correlates: solidarity, responsibility, equity, etc. It tends to establish a protean sense of the firms' responsibility, particularly the larger ones. The largely political dimension of the notion has today consequences on its usage. Sustainable development as addressed in the firm tends to take on the dimension of a management issue, which is likely to persist due to its larger political dimension. Originality/value – The paper provides insight on the catch-all dimension of the notion and its appealing rhetorical character and bases the ambiguity related with references to an “in-between.” On the institutional level, it refers to a social and fair economy that stands arguably in between the state and the market. On the methodological level, it refers to heuristics of fear and hope.
机译:目的–“可持续发展”的概念具有短暂而动荡的历史,包括通过侧重于多维方面并解决许多学科的范围问题而脱离了经济减少主义。它已经成为一个项目,可以基于改革后的资本主义概念重新思考资本主义。本文的目的是研究这个问题。设计/方法/方法–本文基于以下论点:将可持续发展作为一种“模糊”理论进行介绍​​,对公司行为的这种模糊性进行实证研究,其依据是基于可持续发展的概念,以及最后是概念的含糊之处。研究结果–可持续发展的概念引起了人们对以下方面的共识的共识:团结,责任,公平等。它倾向于建立一种对企业的责任,特别是对大型企业的责任感。今天,该概念在很大程度上具有政治意义,对其使用产生了影响。公司所解决的可持续发展往往涉及管理问题,由于其更大的政治意义,这一问题可能会持续下去。独创性/价值–本文提供了对概念的包罗万象的维度及其吸引人的修辞性的见解,并基于与“中间”相关的歧义。在制度层面上,它指的是处于国家和市场之间的社会和公平经济。在方法论层面上,它指的是恐惧和希望的启发法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号