首页> 外文期刊>Society and Business Review >Is an ethical society possible?
【24h】

Is an ethical society possible?

机译:道德社会有可能吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to outline concepts that can build an ethical society. Design/methodology/approach – The paper examines selected literature on citizenship through the lens of theory building-blocks. It identifies the role of leadership in society and its importance in developing society into an ethical one. Findings – The paper distinguishes between a ruler, which is defined socially as a hierarchical position, and a leader, which describes a personal quality and is embedded in psychology. Leadership is a developmental process, which is based on the type of choice a leader makes, which implies that two good options are always available from which to select. Nevertheless, one should make choices in accordance with his worldview, looking for affiliation (i.e. the Theta worldview), or looking for achievement (i.e. the Lambda worldview). Consequently, the choices leaders make for societal activities have to fit their own worldview. Pursuing the fit between one's worldview and planned societal or citizenship activities ensures that society continuously improves its ethical behaviour. The paper concludes with examining the meaning of citizenship and the state in modern times. Research limitations/implications – Being a theory-based exploration, the paper does not provide empirical examples of how this theory might be applied in practice. Originality/value – The paper fills a gap in explaining why current theories could not provide an ethical theory of citizenship. It follows by distinguishing between the definitions of a ruler and a leader. In addition, it questions the viewing of a state as a long-term entity.
机译:目的–本文的目的是概述可以构建道德社会的概念。设计/方法论/方法-本文通过理论构建单元的视角,研究了有关公民身份的精选文献。它确定了领导在社会中的作用及其在将社会发展为道德组织中的重要性。调查结果–本文将标尺(在社会上定义为等级职位)和领导者(描述个人素质并嵌入心理学中)进行了区分。领导力是一个发展过程,它基于领导者做出的选择的类型,这意味着总是有两个好的选择可供选择。但是,应该根据自己的世界观进行选择,寻找从属关系(即Theta世界观)或寻求成就(即Lambda世界观)。因此,领导者为社会活动做出的选择必须符合他们自己的世界观。追求自己的世界观与计划的社会或公民活动之间的契合度,可以确保社会不断改善其道德行为。最后,本文考察了近代公民身份和国家的含义。研究的局限性/含意-作为基于理论的探索,本文没有提供有关该理论如何在实践中应用的经验示例。原创性/价值–该论文填补了解释当前理论为何无法提供公民道德理论的空白。接下来是区分标尺和领导者的定义。此外,它质疑将国家视为长期实体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号