首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Ignorance loops: How non-knowledge about bee-toxic agrochemicals is iteratively produced
【24h】

Ignorance loops: How non-knowledge about bee-toxic agrochemicals is iteratively produced

机译:无知环:如何迭代地产生关于蜜蜂毒性农用化学品的非知识

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this article, I examine the knowledge politics around pesticides in the United States and the role it plays in honey bee declines. Since 2006, US beekeepers have lost an average of one-third of their colonies each year. Though a number of factors influence bee health, beekeepers, researchers and policymakers cite pesticides as a primary contributor. In the US, pesticide registration is overseen by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with the required tests conducted by chemical companies applying for registration. Until 2016, the EPA only required chemical companies to measure acute toxicity for non-target species, which means that many pesticides with sublethal toxicities are not labeled bee-toxic, and farmers can apply them without penalty while bees are on their farms or orchards. In addition, California state and county regulators will typically only investigate a bee kill caused by a labeled bee-toxic pesticide, and so emergent data on non-labeled, sublethal pesticides goes uncollected. These gaps in data collection frustrate beekeepers and disincentivize them from reporting colony losses to regulatory agencies - thus reinforcing ignorance about which chemicals are toxic to bees. I term the iterative cycle of non-knowledge co-constituted by regulatory shortfalls and stakeholder regulatory disengagement an 'ignorance loop'. I conclude with a discussion of what this dynamic can tell us about the politics of knowledge production and pesticide governance and the consequences of 'ignorance loops' for stakeholders and the environment.
机译:在本文中,我研究了美国杀虫剂周围的知识政治以及它在蜂蜜蜜蜂的作用下降。自2006年以来,美国养蜂人每年损失平均殖民地的三分之一。虽然许多因素影响了蜜蜂健康,养蜂人,研究人员和政策制定者将杀虫剂称为主要贡献者。在美国,美国环境保护局(EPA)监督农药登记,由申请注册的化学公司进行的所需测试。直到2016年,EPA只需要化学公司,以测量非目标物种的急性毒性,这意味着许多具有亚麻毒性的农药没有标记为蜂毒性,而农民可以在农场或果园的情况下施加罚款。此外,加州州和县级监管机构通常只研究由标记的蜂毒性农药造成的蜂杀伤,因此对未标记的核心杀虫剂的紧急数据进行了影响。这些数据收集中的这些差距令养蜂人挫败了养蜂人,并使他们从报告他们向监管机构报告殖民地损失 - 因此加强了对蜜蜂毒性有毒的无知。我通过监管缺陷和利益攸关方监管脱离的非知识的迭代周期,“无知环”。我最后讨论了这种动态可以告诉我们知识产量和农药治理的政治以及利益相关者和环境“无知环”的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号