首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Global Software and its Provenance: Generification Work in the Production of Organizational Software Packages
【24h】

Global Software and its Provenance: Generification Work in the Production of Organizational Software Packages

机译:全球软件及其来源:组织软件包生产中的生成工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper addresses the seemingly implausible project of establishing a 'generic' organizational information system. This is an apparent contradiction: on the one hand, we are told of the diversity of specific organizational contexts and on the other, we often find the same standardized software solutions being applied across those settings. How do generic software packages work in so many different contexts? Science and Technology Studies provides contrasting accounts of how this contradiction is resolved: either stressing the unwanted organizational change that standardized systems may bring; or, alternatively, insisting these technologies can only be made to work through processes of 'localization'. We argue that the focus on specificity versus localization of application contexts draws attention away from enquiring into the origins and characteristics of generic solutions. Through comparing the design and evolution of two software packages we shift the debate from understanding how technologies are made to work within particular settings to how they are built to work across a diverse range of organizational contexts. Our question is 'How do software packages achieve the mobility that allows them to bridge the heterogeneity within organizations and between organizations in different sectors and cultures?' We describe a set of revealed strategies through which suppliers produce software that embodies characteristics common across many users; what we term generification work. One aspect of this process of generification is the configuring of users within 'managed communities', but it also includes 'smoothing' the contents of the package and, at times, reverting to 'social authority'. Our argument is that generic systems do exist but that they are brought into being through an intricately managed process, involving the broader extension of a particularized software application and, at the same time, the management of the user community attached to that solution.
机译:本文讨论了建立“通用”组织信息系统的看似令人难以置信的项目。这是一个明显的矛盾:一方面,我们被告知特定组织环境的多样性,另一方面,我们经常发现在这些设置中应用了相同的标准化软件解决方案。通用软件包如何在这么多不同的环境中工作?科学与技术研究提供了有关如何解决这一矛盾的对比说明:要么强调标准化系统可能带来的不必要的组织变革;要么强调标准化体系可能带来的组织变革。或者,坚持认为这些技术只能通过“本地化”过程来工作。我们认为,对应用程序上下文的特定性与本地化的关注使人们将注意力从询问通用解决方案的起源和特征上转移了。通过比较两个软件包的设计和演进,我们将辩论从理解如何使技术在特定环境下工作转变为如何在各种组织环境下工作而构建。我们的问题是“软件包如何实现可移动性,从而使它们能够弥合组织内部以及不同部门和文化的组织之间的异质性?”我们描述了一套已揭示的策略,供应商通过这些策略来生产体现许多用户共有特征的软件;我们称之为生成工作。这种泛化过程的一方面是在“托管社区”内配置用户,但同时还包括“整理”软件包内容,有时还包括恢复“社会权威”。我们的观点是,通用系统的确存在,但是它们是通过复杂的管理过程而形成的,该过程涉及特定软件应用程序的更广泛扩展,同时还涉及该解决方案所附带的用户社区的管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号