首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >The shortsighted brain:Neuroeconomics and the governance of choice in time
【24h】

The shortsighted brain:Neuroeconomics and the governance of choice in time

机译:短视大脑:神经经济学和及时的选择治理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

nds@mit.edu;; ;The young field of neuroeconomics converges around behavioral deviations from the model of the human being as Homo economicus.a rational actor who calculates his choices to maximize his individual satisfaction. In a historical moment characterized by economic, health,and environmental crises, policymakers have become increasingly concerned about a particular deviation for which neuroeconomics offers a biological explanation: Why do humans value the present at the expense of the future? There is contentious debate within the field over how to model this tendency at the neural level. Should the brain be conceptualized as a unified decision-making apparatus, or as the site of conflict between an impetuous limbic system at perpetual odds with its deliberate and provident overseer in the prefrontal cortex? Scientific debates over choice-making in the brain, we argue, are also debates over how to define the constraints on human reason with which regulative strategies must contend. Drawing on ethnographic and archival research, we explore how the brain and its treatment of the future become the contested terrain for distinct visions of governmental intervention into problems of human choice-making.
机译:nds@mit.edu ;; ;神经经济学的年轻领域围绕行为偏离与作为“人类人”的人类模型的偏离。理性人通过计算选择来最大化个人满意度。在以经济,健康和环境危机为特征的历史时刻,决策者越来越关注神经经济学提供生物学解释的特定偏差:为什么人们以牺牲未来为代价来珍视现在?关于如何在神经水平上模拟这种趋势,该领域存在争议。应该将大脑概念化为统一的决策工具,还是永久性的浮躁的边缘系统与前额叶皮层中故意的和公积的监督者之间发生冲突的地点?我们认为,关于大脑中做出选择的科学辩论,也是关于如何定义人为理性的限制的辩论,而调控策略必须与之相抗衡。利用人种学和档案学的研究,我们探索了大脑及其对未来的处理方式,如何成为政府干预人类选择决策问题的独特视野的有争议领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号