...
首页> 外文期刊>Social science computer review >Drop Downs and Scroll Mice: The Effect of Response Option Format and Input Mechanism Employed on Data Quality in Web Surveys
【24h】

Drop Downs and Scroll Mice: The Effect of Response Option Format and Input Mechanism Employed on Data Quality in Web Surveys

机译:下拉菜单和滚动鼠标:响应选项格式和采用的输入机制对网络调查中数据质量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Online researchers face whether to use radio buttons or drop downs when presenting respondents with "select one answer from many" questions. However, empirical evidence regarding response effects does not provide direction for favoring one. Using data collected in a New Zealand general population Web survey of 2,400 people, this study contributes to the decision process by investigating format response effects at multiple levels and exploring the potential for input mechanisms to interfere with drop-down answer selection. Format choice did not significantly affect survey completions, number of nonsubstantial answers, or time to completion. However, drop downs led to higher item nonresponse and longer response times. Furthermore, the 76% of respondents using scroll mice to complete the survey were prone to accidentally changing an answer if presented with drop-down questions. This increased average response times and skewed distribution of responses to the drop-down treatment questions toward the bottom of the response list. Implications of these findings for Web-based data collection are discussed.
机译:在线研究人员在向受访者提出“从许多中选择一个答案”问题时,会面对使用单选按钮还是下拉菜单的问题。但是,有关响应效果的经验证据并不能为偏爱提供指导。利用在2400人中进行的新西兰一般人群网络调查中收集的数据,本研究通过调查多个级别的格式响应效果并探索输入机制干扰下拉答案选择的潜力,为决策过程做出了贡献。格式选择对调查的完成情况,非实质性答案的数量或完成时间没有明显影响。但是,下拉菜单会导致更高的项目无响应性和更长的响应时间。此外,使用滚动鼠标完成调查的受访者中有76%的人如果出现下拉问题,很容易意外更改答案。这增加了平均响应时间,并且对下拉式处理问题的响应偏向于响应列表的底部。讨论了这些发现对基于Web的数据收集的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号