首页> 外文期刊>Social science computer review >Open Government and Democracy: A Research Review
【24h】

Open Government and Democracy: A Research Review

机译:开放政府与民主:研究综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concept of open government, having been promoted widely in the past 5 years, has promised a broader notion than e-government, as supposed to fundamentally transform governments to become more open and participative and collaborative. Unfortunately, this has not significantly enhanced a set of fundamental problems regarding e-government. One of the problems is that the underlying democratic ideology is rarely clearly expressed. In this paper, we have therefore constructed a framework for the analysis of open government from a democratic perspective, to explore the research foundation of open government and the types of research missing. We have looked closely at the notion of democracy in peer-reviewed journals on open government from 2009 to 2013, focusing on discussions of some fundamental issues regarding democracy and the type of solutions suggested. We have found that despite seemingly good intentions and an extensive rhetoric, there is still an apparent lack of adequate tools in which public deliberation and representation are addressed in any meaningful sense. There are two main important observations herein: (i) the rhetoric in the dominant discourse supports the concept of open government formulated by the Obama administration as transparency, participation, and collaboration, but in practice, the focus is predominantly on transparency and information exchange, while ignoring fundamental democratic issues regarding participation and collaboration, and (ii) the concept of the public is inadequately considered as a homogenous entity rather than a diversified group with different interests, preferences, and abilities.
机译:在过去的五年中,开放政府的概念得到了广泛推广,它提出了比电子政务更广泛的概念,因为它应该从根本上改变政府,使其变得更加开放,参与性和协作性更高。不幸的是,这并未显着增强一系列有关电子政务的基本问题。问题之一是根本的民主意识形态很少清楚地表达出来。因此,在本文中,我们构建了一个从民主的角度分析开放政府的框架,以探索开放政府的研究基础和缺少的研究类型。在2009年至2013年间,我们在开放政府的同行评审期刊中密切关注了民主的概念,重点是讨论有关民主的一些基本问题和建议的解决方案类型。我们发现,尽管有良好的意图和广泛的言论,但显然仍然缺乏足够的工具来以任何有意义的方式处理公众的讨论和代表。这里有两个主要的重要观察结果:(i)占主导地位的言论支持奥巴马政府提出的公开政府的概念,即透明度,参与度和合作度,但实际上,重点是透明度和信息交换,同时忽略了关于参与和协作的基本民主问题;(ii)公众的概念没有被适当地视为同质实体,而不是具有不同兴趣,偏好和能力的多元化群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号