首页> 外文期刊>Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society >The Impact of Conservative Discourses in Family Policies, Population Politics, and Gender Rights in Poland and Turkey
【24h】

The Impact of Conservative Discourses in Family Policies, Population Politics, and Gender Rights in Poland and Turkey

机译:保守性话语在波兰和土耳其对家庭政策,人口政治和性别权利的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article uses childcare as a case study to test the impact of ideas that embody a traditional understanding of gender relations in relation to childcare. Conservative ideas regard increasing female labor market participation as a cause of decreasing fertility on the functioning of a set of general policies to increase fertility rates. It looks into the Polish and Turkish contexts for empirical evidence. The Polish context shows a highly institutionalized system of family policies in contrast to almost unessential institutions in Turkey. Formally, the labor market participation of women is much lower in Turkey than in Poland. Yet, given the size of the informal market in Turkey, women's labor participation is obviously higher than what appears in the statistics. Bearing in mind this divergence, the article suggests Poland and Turkey as two typologies for studying population politics in contexts where socially conservative ideas regarding gender remain paramount. We qualify ideas as conservative if they enforce a traditional understanding of gender relations in care-giving and underline women's role in the labor market as an element of declining fertility. In order to delineate ideational impact, this article looks into how ideas (a) supplant and (b) substitute formal institutions. Therefore, we argue that there are two mechanisms pertaining to the dominance of conservative conventions: conservative ideas may either supplant the institutional impact on family policies, or substitute them thanks to a superior reasoning which societies assign to them. Furthermore, conservative conventions prevail alongside women's customary unpaid work as care-givers regardless of the level of their formal workforce participation. We propose as our major findings for the literature of population politics that ideas, as ubiquitous belief systems, are more powerful than institutions since they provide what is perceived as legitimate, acceptable, and good for the societies under study. In the end, irrespective of the presence of institutions, socially conservative ideas prevail.
机译:本文以儿童保育为案例研究,以检验体现传统观念对与儿童保育有关的性别关系的观念的影响。保守的想法将增加女性劳动力市场的参与视为导致生育率下降的原因,这是一系列旨在提高生育率的一般政策的作用。它从波兰和土耳其的语境中寻找经验证据。波兰的情况表明,与土耳其几乎不需要的制度相比,家庭政策制度化程度很高。正式而言,土耳其妇女的劳动力市场参与率远低于波兰。然而,鉴于土耳其非正式市场的规模,妇女的劳动参与显然高于统计数据。考虑到这种分歧,本文建议波兰和土耳其为在社会性别保守观念仍然至关重要的情况下研究人口政治的两种类型。如果这些观念在照料中加强了对性别关系的传统理解,并强调了妇女在劳动力市场中的作用,即生育力下降的因素,那么我们认为这些观念是保守的。为了描述观念上的影响,本文研究了观念(a)取代和(b)替代正式制度的方式。因此,我们认为,有两种机制与保守派公约的统治地位有关:保守派思想可能会取代对家庭政策的制度影响,或者由于社会赋予它们的优越的推理而将其取代。此外,无论妇女参加正式工作的程度如何,保守的惯例都与妇女的无酬常规工作同时作为照料者。我们认为,作为普遍存在的信仰体系的思想比制度更强大,这是人口政治文学的主要发现,因为思想所提供的东西被认为是对所研究社会的合法,可接受和有益的。最后,不管机构的存在如何,社会保守的思想都盛行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号