首页> 外文期刊>Social Indicators Research >Measuring Social Capital and Its Differentials by Family Structures
【24h】

Measuring Social Capital and Its Differentials by Family Structures

机译:通过家庭结构衡量社会资本及其差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Social capital has often been invoked to explain differences in children’s well-being by family structure. That is, developmental outcome for children in lone or step parent family is not at par with that of children from intact family because parental investments on children may be lower not only in financial and human capital but also in social capital. This proposition has been difficult to examine in greater depth because of lack of conceptual clarity and of data to measure social capital. Using a definition of social capital as the “ability to secure benefits through membership in networks and other social structures”, we focus on the impact of family structures on social capital engendered by three types of networks: (a) informal ties with kin, families, friends, neighbours, and workmates; (b) generalized relationships with local people, people in civic groups, and people in general; and, (c) relationships through institutions. In particular, we examine differences in the measures of social capital among women living with no children in various marital arrangements, and women living with children in intact, step, and lone parent families. Data from the Canadian 2003 General Social Survey on Social Engagement confirm that social capital is indeed greater in intact families than in lone parent families. Mothers in intact families (especially married mothers) have larger informal networks, are members of more primordial and purposive organizations, have greater trust in people in the family, in the neighbourhood, and in people in general, and have greater confidence in government or business institutions. In general, social capital of mothers in step families is in between that of married mothers in intact families and lone mothers. Thus, the assumption in the literature that family structure can serve as a proxy for social capital may be justified. However, this study contributes a unique way of measuring social capital in terms of networks if and when data are available and a way of investigating the relationship between family structure and social capital; that is, the former as a determinant of the latter.
机译:社会资本经常被用来解释家庭结构对儿童幸福感的影响。也就是说,单亲或继父母家庭的孩子的发展结果与完整家庭的孩子的发展结果不相称,因为父母对孩子的投资可能不仅在财务和人力资本上而且在社会资本上都较低。由于缺乏概念上的明确性和用于衡量社会资本的数据,很难对这一主张进行更深入的研究。使用社会资本的定义为“通过网络和其他社会结构的成员身份获得利益的能力”,我们将重点放在家庭结构对由三种类型的网络产生的社会资本的影响上:(a)与亲戚,家庭的非正式联系,朋友,邻居和同事; (b)与当地人,公民团体和一般民众的普遍关系; (c)通过机构建立关系。特别是,我们研究了在各种婚姻安排中没有子女的妇女与在完整,有步骤和单亲家庭中有子女的妇女之间的社会资本测度差异。加拿大2003年社会参与一般社会调查的数据证实,完整家庭的社会资本确实比单亲家庭更大。完好无损的家庭中的母亲(尤其是已婚母亲)拥有更大的非正式网络,是更为原始和有目的性的组织的成员,对家庭,邻里以及一般人的信任度更高,对政府或企业的信任度更高机构。一般而言,继母家庭中母亲的社会资本介于完整家庭中已婚母亲和单身母亲之间。因此,文献中关于家庭结构可以作为社会资本的代理的假设可能是合理的。然而,这项研究提供了一种独特的方法来衡量是否存在网络(何时可用)的社会资本,以及一种调查家庭结构与社会资本之间关系的方法。也就是说,前者是后者的决定因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号