首页> 外文期刊>Social Choice and Welfare >Equal rights to trade and mediate
【24h】

Equal rights to trade and mediate

机译:贸易和调解的平等权利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Consider any exchange economy with a fixed finite set of traders whose preference orderings and feasible sets of net trades satisfy standard convexity and continuity assumptions. Suppose these traders are granted equal rights to choose net trade vectors within a common convex cone. This property, when combined with Pareto efficiency, characterizes Walrasian equilibrium without lump-sum transfers in two special cases: when there are only two goods; or when at least one trader has unique supporting prices. In general, even without imposing Pareto efficiency explicitly, conferring an additional right to mediate mutually beneficial transactions with other traders will characterize Walrasian equilibrium.An early version was presented to the Conference on Axiomatic Resource Allocation Theory in Namur, July 1999, in honour of Louis Gevers, with whom I have had many enjoyable and fruitful exchanges since we first met in 1971. A later version was presented at the conference of the Society for Social Choice and Welfare in Alicante, June/July 2000. It is a pleasant duty to acknowledge helpful discussions at these conferences with Marc Fleurbaey, François Maniquet, and Yves Sprumont, as well as subsequently with Karl Vind. Further very helpful suggestions came from two anonymous referees, as well as François Maniquet acting in an editorial role. Finally, my gratitute to the Institute of Economic Research at Hitotsubashi University, to the Japanese Ministry of Education, and to my host Kotaro Suzumura, for making possible a visit in Autumn 1998 during which preliminary research for this paper was conducted.
机译:考虑具有固定有限交易者集合的任何交换经济,这些交易者的偏好顺序和可行的净交易集合满足标准凸度和连续性假设。假设授予这些交易者同等的权利,可以在公共凸锥内选择净交易向量。当与帕累托效率相结合时,该特性在两种特殊情况下表现出无一次性转移的瓦尔拉斯均衡特征:或至少有一个交易者具有独特的支持价格时。总的来说,即使没有明确规定帕累托效率,授予额外的权利来调解与其他交易者的互惠交易也将体现瓦尔拉斯均衡.1999年7月在那慕尔举行的无公害资源分配理论会议上,为纪念路易斯而提出了一个早期版本。自从我们1971年首次见面以来,我与Gevers进行了许多愉快而富有成果的交流。在2000年6月/ 7月于阿利坎特举行的社会选择与福利协会会议上,提出了更高版本。在这些会议上与Marc Fleurbaey,FrançoisManiquet和Yves Sprumont以及随后与Karl Vind进行了有益的讨论。来自两名匿名裁判以及FrançoisManiquet担任编辑的角色也提供了非常有用的建议。最后,我要感谢一桥大学经济研究所,日本教育部以及我的房东铃村孝太郎(Kotaro Suzumura),因为他们有可能在1998年秋天进行访问,在此期间对本文进行了初步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号