首页> 外文期刊>Social Choice and Welfare >‘One and a Half Dimensional’ Preferences and Majority Rule
【24h】

‘One and a Half Dimensional’ Preferences and Majority Rule

机译:“一维半数”首选项和多数规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I examine a model of majority rule in which alternatives are described by two characteristics: (1) their position in a standard, left-right dimension, and (2) their position in a good-bad dimension, over which voters have identical preferences. I show that when voters’ preferences are single-peaked and concave over the first dimension, majority rule is transitive, and the majority’s preferences are identical to the median voter’s. Thus, Black’s (The theory of committees and elections, 1958) theorem extends to such a “one and a half” dimensional framework. Meanwhile, another well-known result of majority rule, Downs’ (An economic theory of democracy, 1957) electoral competition model, does not extend to the framework. The condition that preferences can be represented in a one-and-a-half-dimensional framework is strictly weaker than the condition that preferences be single-peaked and symmetric. The condition is strictly stronger than the condition that preferences be order-restricted, as defined by Rothstein (Soc Choice Welf 7:331–342;1990).
机译:我研究了一种多数制规则模型,其中的替代方案由两个特征描述:(1)在标准维度上的位置(左右维度),以及(2)在优劣维度上的投票者对选民的偏好相同。我表明,当选民的喜好在第一维度上是单峰的并且是凹入的时,多数人规则是可传递的,并且多数人的偏好与中位数选民的相同。因此,布莱克(委员会和选举理论,1958年)定理扩展到了这样的“一个一半”的维度框架。同时,多数人统治的另一项著名结果唐斯(1957年的民主经济理论)选举竞争模型并未扩展到该框架。偏好可以在一个半维的框架中表示的条件比偏好是单峰对称的条件要严格得多。根据Rothstein的定义(Soc Choice Welf 7:331–342; 1990),该条件严格地强于偏好受顺序限制的条件。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Choice and Welfare》 |2007年第2期|321-335|共15页
  • 作者

    T. Groseclose;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Political Science, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号