首页> 外文期刊>Social Choice and Welfare >Liberal political equality implies proportional representation
【24h】

Liberal political equality implies proportional representation

机译:自由政治平等意味着比例代表制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article shows that for a single-vote electoral system for a representative body to treat all voters and all parties equally, it must produce results essentially identical to list proportional representation (PR). Democratic theory has often been agnostic concerning representative institutions. Different institutions have been compared in terms of behavioral outcomes rather than axiomatic properties. Building on van der Hout (Annual meeting of the Public Choice Society, San Diego, 2002) result, we show that for an electoral system to completely respect the principle of liberal political equality and popular sovereignty, its results must be equivalent to those of list PR.
机译:本文显示,要使代表机构采用单票选举制,以平等对待所有选民和所有政党,它必须产生与清单比例代表制(PR)基本相同的结果。民主理论常常与代表机构无关。比较了不同机构的行为结果而不是公理性质。基于范德·豪特(公共选择学会年会,圣地亚哥,2002年)的结果,我们表明,要完全尊重自由政治平等和人民主权原则的选举制度,其结果必须与清单所列结果相同。公关

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Choice and Welfare》 |2009年第4期|617-627|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Universiteit van Tilburg, Room P 3224, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands;

    Department of Government, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号