Federal appeals court rules against MSHA’s jurisdiction beyond mine site

首页> 外文期刊>SNL Energy Coal Report >Federal appeals court rules against MSHA’s jurisdiction beyond mine site

【24h】

Federal appeals court rules against MSHA’s jurisdiction beyond mine site

机译：联邦上诉法院针对MSHA在矿区以外的管辖权提出上诉

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

团队文献服务 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A federal appeals court has found that the U.S. Mine Safety and HealthrnAdministration overstepped its jurisdiction in issuing citations to a minernequipment repair facility.

机译：联邦上诉法院发现，美国矿山安全与健康管理局在向小型设备维修设施发出引用文献时，超越了其管辖权。

著录项

来源
《SNL Energy Coal Report 》 |2017年第12期| 24-24| 共1页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. COURT OF APPEALS FOR FEDERAL CIRCUIT LACKED SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER PATENTEE'S APPEAL [J] . Intellectual property counselor . 2013 ,第202期

机译：专利上诉中联邦电路缺乏主体管辖权的上诉法院
2. Court refjects Kaiser's appeal, says MSHA does have jurisdiction in case [J] . CHEMICAL HAZARDS IN INDUSTRY Group Chemical hazards in industry . 2000 ,第Auga期

机译：法院拒绝Kaiser的上诉，称MSHA确实具有管辖权
3. Federal appeals court finds MSHA process for appointing judges invalid [J] . Joanna Parungao SNL Energy Coal Report . 2018 ,第28A期

机译：联邦上诉法院裁定MSHA任命法官的程序无效
4. BACK TO THE FUTURE? DID THE FEDERAL APPEALS COURT RULE CORRECTLY ON FLOW CONTROL IN THE ONEIDA-HERKIMER CASE? [C] . David Biderman SWANA(Solid Waste Association of North America)'s 39th Annual International Solid Waste Exposition, Oct 15-18, 2001, Baltimore, Maryland . 2001

机译：回到未来？在oneidaa-herkimer案中，联邦上诉法院规则是否正确地控制了流量？
5. The impact of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on federal administrative agencies, 1954-1990. [D] . Spriggs, James Frederick, II. 1994

机译：1954年至1990年，最高法院和哥伦比亚特区上诉法院对联邦行政机构的影响。
6. Federal Court Rules Bias in Federally Aided Hospitals Unconstitutional [O] . 1963

机译：联邦法院裁定联邦资助医院的偏见违宪
7. The Function (or Malfunction) of Equity in the Charity Law of Canada’s Federal Courts: This essay explores what, if anything, it means for the Federal Court of Appeal to be a “court of equity” in the exercise of its jurisdiction over matters related to charitable registration under the Income Tax Act. The equitable jurisdiction over charities encompasses a number of curative principles, which the Court of Chancery traditionally invoked to save indefinite or otherwise defective charitable gifts. The author identifies some of these equitable principles and contemplates how their invocation might have altered the course of certain unsuccessful charitable registration appeals. She then considers the principal arguments for and against the Federal Court of Appeal applying these equitable principles when adjudicating matters related to registered charity status. [O] . 2016

机译：加拿大联邦法院《慈善法》中的平等职能（或失灵）：本文探讨了联邦上诉法院在行使对相关事宜的管辖权时成为“平等法院”的含义（如果有的话）根据《所得税法》进行慈善注册。对慈善组织的公平管辖权包括许多治疗原则，传统上，检举法院援引这些原则以保存无限期或其他有缺陷的慈善礼物。作者指出了其中一些公平原则，并考虑了其调用可能如何改变了某些不成功的慈善注册上诉的过程。然后，她在裁定与注册慈善身分有关的事项时，考虑支持和反对联邦上诉法院的主要论据，运用这些公平原则。

Federal appeals court rules against MSHA’s jurisdiction beyond mine site

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅