首页> 外文期刊>Small wars & insurgencies >Suppressing insurgencies in comparison: the Germans in the Ukraine, 1918, and the British in Mesopotamia, 1920
【24h】

Suppressing insurgencies in comparison: the Germans in the Ukraine, 1918, and the British in Mesopotamia, 1920

机译:比较而言,镇压叛乱者:乌克兰的德国人(1918年)和英国的美索不达米亚(1920年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years two theories have emerged in academia with regards to 'small wars': A 'German way of war' and a 'British way of war'. The first one believes in a specific German military culture until 1945 accepting mass violence against civilians to quell any form of civil unrest. The second theory stresses a moderate British approach during the twentieth century; in defeating insurgencies the British Army had applied 'minimum force'. This article challenges both views by looking into two largely forgotten counter-insurgency campaigns by the end of the First World War: The Germans in the Ukraine in 1918 and the British in Mesopotamia in 1920. It will be argued that one cannot speak in general terms about a ruthless German and a moderate British approach during this period - in fact it was quite the contrary in some ways.
机译:近年来,学术界出现了关于“小战争”的两种理论:“德国的战争方式”和“英国的战争方式”。第一个人相信一种特定的德国军事文化,直到1945年才接受针对平民的大规模暴力镇压任何形式的内乱。第二种理论强调了二十世纪英国的温和态度。在打败叛乱方面,英国陆军使用了“最小力量”。本文通过考察第一次世界大战结束前两个被人们广泛遗忘的平叛运动,挑战了这两种观点:1918年在乌克兰的德国人和1920年在美索不达米亚的英国人。关于在此期间冷酷无情的德国人和温和的英国态度-实际上,在某些方面完全相反。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号