首页> 外文期刊>Sensors and materials >Sensing Analysis of Feature Extraction Types for Handwritten Character Recognition
【24h】

Sensing Analysis of Feature Extraction Types for Handwritten Character Recognition

机译:手写字符识别中特征提取类型的感知分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For HCCR, the three convNet-based methods obtained the highest accuracies of 94.53, 94.73, and 94.97%, but the accuracies of the other two types, LDD and GD, were 91.93 and 92.66%, respectively. Similarly, for HJCR, the accuracies of the three convNet-based methods were 94.32, 94.89, and 95.11%, but those of LDD and GD were 91.82 and 93.43%, respectively. Therefore, the convNet-based feature extraction is the most robust and discriminating compared with the two traditional methods, LDD and GD, for both HCCR and HJCR. The two convNet-based methods with domain-specific knowledge, convNet-based-LDD and convNet-based-GD, obtained the best accuracies of 94.73 and 94.97% for HCCR and HJCR, respectively. However, the accuracies of convNet-based-Raw without domain-specific knowledge were 94.53 and 94.32% for HCCR and HJCR, respectively. The results demonstrate that domain-specific knowledge makes the convNet-based method more efficient and effective for HCCR and HJCR.
机译:对于HCCR,三种基于convNet的方法的最高准确度分别为94.53、94.73和94.97%,而其他两种LDD和GD的准确度分别为91.93和92.66%。同样,对于HJCR,这三种基于convNet的方法的准确度分别为94.32、94.89和95.11%,而LDD和GD的准确度分别为91.82和93.43%。因此,与HCCR和HJCR两种传统方法LDD和GD相比,基于convNet的特征提取是最可靠和最有区别的。两种基于特定领域知识的基于convNet的方法,基于convNet-LDD和基于convNet-GD的HCCR和HJCR的最佳精度分别为94.73和94.97%。但是,HCCR和HJCR的基于convNet的Raw的准确度分别为94.53%和94.32%。结果表明,特定领域的知识使基于convNet的方法对于HCCR和HJCR更加有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号