首页> 外文期刊>Sensors and Actuators >Sensitivity comparison of surface plasmon resonance and plasmon-waveguide resonance biosensors
【24h】

Sensitivity comparison of surface plasmon resonance and plasmon-waveguide resonance biosensors

机译:表面等离子体共振与等离子体波导共振生物传感器的灵敏度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Plasmon-waveguide resonance (PWR) sensors are particularly useful for the investigation of biomolec-ular interactions with or within lipid bilayer membranes. Many studies demonstrated their ability to provide unique qualitative information, but the evaluation of their sensitivity as compared to other surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensors has not been broadly investigated. We report here a comprehensive sensitivity comparison of SPR and PWR biosensors for the p-polarized light component. The sensitivity of five different biosensor designs to changes in refractive index, thickness and mass are determined and discussed. Although numerical simulations show an increase of the electric field intensity by 30-35% and the penetration depth by four times in PWR, the waveguide-based method is 0.5-8-fold less sensitive than conventional SPR in all considered analytical parameters. The experimental results also suggest that the increase in the penetration depth in PWR is made at the expense of the surface sensitivity. The physical and structural reasons for PWR sensor limitations are discussed and a general viewpoint for designing more efficient SPR sensors based on dielectric slab waveguides is provided.
机译:等离子体波导共振(PWR)传感器对于研究与脂质双层膜或在脂质双层膜内的生物分子相互作用特别有用。许多研究表明,它们能够提供独特的定性信息,但是与其他表面等离子体共振(SPR)传感器相比,其灵敏度评估尚未得到广泛研究。我们在这里报告了SPR和PWR生物传感器对p偏振光分量的综合灵敏度比较。确定并讨论了五种不同的生物传感器设计对折射率,厚度和质量变化的敏感性。尽管数值模拟显示,在PWR中,电场强度增加了30-35%,穿透深度增加了四倍,但是在所有考虑的分析参数中,基于波导的方法的灵敏度比传统SPR低0.5-8倍。实验结果还表明,PWR渗透深度的增加是以牺牲表面灵敏度为代价的。讨论了PWR传感器局限性的物理和结构原因,并提供了基于介电平板波导设计更有效的SPR传感器的一般观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号