首页> 外文期刊>Security studies >Center of Gravity: Domestic Institutions and the Victory of Liberal Strategy in Cold War Europe
【24h】

Center of Gravity: Domestic Institutions and the Victory of Liberal Strategy in Cold War Europe

机译:重心:国内机构与冷战欧洲自由策略的胜利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Cold War strategy in Western Europe almost exclusively followed the US policy of containment. Conventional explanations for this continuity, however, fail to account for both the strategic rationale and the scale of domestic support behind attempts to disengage from the Cold War. This article seeks to explain why containment won out over disengagement in European strategy. By highlighting the underlying liberal tenets of containment, it argues this victory owed more to the advantages afforded the political center by the political institutions of Western Europe than to the logic of containment strategy itself. The occupation of the center-ground by advocates of containment afforded them distinct institutional advantages, including an increased likelihood of representation in government, greater bargaining strength relative to other parties, and limited sources of viable opposition. The dependence of containment strategy on centrist strength is demonstrated through a discussion of the politics of strategy in the French Fourth Republic.
机译:西欧的冷战战略几乎完全遵循美国的遏制政策。但是,关于这种连续性的常规解释不能同时考虑到脱离冷战的战略原因和国内支持的规模。本文试图解释为什么在欧洲战略中遏制胜过脱离接触。通过强调遏制的基本自由主义原则,它认为这次胜利更多是由于西欧政治机构所提供的政治中心优势而不是遏制战略本身的逻辑。遏制倡导者占领中心地带为其提供了独特的制度优势,包括增加了在政府中任职的可能性,相对于其他政党的议价能力以及可行的反对派来源有限。通过对法兰西第四共和国战略政治的讨论,可以证明遏制战略对中间派力量的依赖。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Security studies》 |2019年第1期|116-158|共43页
  • 作者

    Martill Benjamin;

  • 作者单位

    London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, LSE Ideas, London, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号