首页> 外文期刊>Securities Regulation Law Journal >Delaware and Insider Trading: The Chancery Court Rejects Federal Preemption Arguments of Corporate Directors
【24h】

Delaware and Insider Trading: The Chancery Court Rejects Federal Preemption Arguments of Corporate Directors

机译:特拉华州和内幕交易:检察法庭驳回了公司董事的联邦先发制人的论点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For decades, the federal courts have applied Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 to combat insider trading. However, the bar on insider trading has its roots in state corporate law, specifically, in the common law doctrine of the fiduciary duty of loyalty. The history of the judicial regulation of insider trading under Delaware law and its interplay with the federal regulatory scheme are the subject of the Delaware Court of Chancery's recent decision in Pfeiffer v. Toll, in which the court upheld shareholder derivative claims against eight corporate directors for insider trading under state law.
机译:数十年来,联邦法院一直采用1934年《证券交易法》第10(b)条和第10b-5条来打击内幕交易。但是,内幕交易的禁令根植于州公司法,特别是忠诚于忠实义务的普通法学说。根据特拉华州法律对内幕交易进行司法监管的历史及其与联邦监管计划的相互作用,是特拉华州法院法院最近在Pfeiffer v。Toll案中作出的裁决的主题,在该裁决中,法院维持了针对八名公司董事的股东衍生权主张。根据州法律进行内幕交易。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号