...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >Co-author inclusion: A novel recursive algorithmic method for dealing with homonyms in bibliometric analysis
【24h】

Co-author inclusion: A novel recursive algorithmic method for dealing with homonyms in bibliometric analysis

机译:合着作者:一种新的递归算法方法,用于处理文献计量学分析中的同音异义词

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Large scale bibliometric analysis is often hindered by the presence of homonyms, or namesakes, of the researchers of interest in literature databases. This makes it difficult to build up a true picture of a researcher's publication record, as publications by another researcher with the same name will be included in search results. Using additional information such as title and author addresses, an expert in the field can generally tell if a paper is by a researcher or a namesake; however, manual checking is not practical in large scale studies. Previously various methods have been used to address this problem, chiefly based on filtering by subject, funding acknowledgement or author address. Co-author inclusion is a novel algorithmic method based on co-authorship for dealing with problems of homonyms in large bibliometric surveys. We compared co-author inclusion and subject and funding based filter against the manual assignment of papers by a subject expert (which we assumed to be correct). The subject and funding based filtering identifies only 75% as many papers as assigned by manual scoring. By using co-author inclusion once we increase this to 95%, two further rounds produces 99% as many papers as manual filtering. Although the number of papers identified that were not assigned to the Pis manually also increases, the absolute number is low: rising from 0.2% papers with subject and funding filtering, to 3% papers for three rounds of co-author inclusion.
机译:在文献数据库中,感兴趣的研究人员经常存在同音异义词或同名异物,这通常会阻碍大规模文献计量分析。这使得很难建立研究人员出版物记录的真实图片,因为另一位具有相同名称的研究人员的出版物将包含在搜索结果中。使用标题和作者地址等其他信息,该领域的专家通常可以判断论文是由研究人员撰写的还是同名作品;但是,手动检查在大规模研究中不切实际。以前,主要基于基于主题,资金确认或作者地址的筛选,已使用各种方法来解决此问题。共同作者包含是一种基于共同作者的新颖算法,用于处理大型文献计量学调查中的同音异义问题。我们将合著者收录和基于主题和资金的过滤器与主题专家手动分配论文(我们认为是正确的)进行了比较。基于主题和资金的过滤只能识别手动评分分配的论文数量的75%。通过使用合作作者收录,一旦我们将其增加到95%,再进行两轮就可以产生与手动过滤一样多的99%的论文。尽管确定的未手动分配给Pi的论文数量也有所增加,但绝对数量却很少:从具有主题和资金过滤功能的0.2%论文增加到三轮共同作者纳入的3%论文。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号