首页> 外文期刊>Science >Paper Retraction Puts Focus on Informed Consent Rules
【24h】

Paper Retraction Puts Focus on Informed Consent Rules

机译:纸张缩回将重点放在知情同意规则上

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Stung by a front-page newspaper expose of an alleged lapse in research ethics, officials at the University of Tokyo's Institute of Medical Science are planning to overhaul efforts to educate researchers on ethics rules and tighten internal review and compliance procedures. At the same time, scientific journals are getting stricter about documenting the fact that human studies have undergone ethics review. "What we learned is that periodic educational efforts to raise everyone's awareness of clinical research ethics guidelines were insufficient," says Motoharu Seiki, the institute's dean. The incident centers on a group led by Arinobu Tojo, who works on molecular therapies for leukemia. The group retracted a paper on acute myeloid leukemia by Sei-ichiro Kobayashi et al. that was published online on 21 May and in the 1 July issue of Haematologica. An investigation determined that a statement the authors made to the journal that the study had been approved by an institutional review board (IRB) was erroneous (Science, 18 July, p. 324).
机译:东京大学医学科学研究所的官员被头版报纸ung住,揭露了所谓的研究道德失范,正计划全面改革对研究人员进行道德规范教育的工作,并加强内部审查和合规程序。同时,科学期刊在记录人类研究受到伦理审查的事实方面越来越严格。该研究所所长Motoharu Seiki说:“我们了解到,为使每个人对临床研究伦理准则的认识而进行的定期教育工作是不够的。”该事件的中心是由Arinobu Tojo领导的一个小组,该小组致力于白血病的分子疗法。该小组撤回了Sei-ichiro Kobayashi等人发表的关于急性髓细胞性白血病的论文。该文章于5月21日在线发表,并于7月1日在Haematologica上发表。一项调查确定,作者向该杂志发表的一项声明表明该研究已得到机构审查委员会(IRB)的批准是错误的(《科学》,7月18日,第324页)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2008年第5888期|p.474|共1页
  • 作者

    DENNIS NORMILE;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:55:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号