首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Ecological risk assessment of pesticide residues in soils from vegetable production areas: A case study in S-Nepal
【24h】

Ecological risk assessment of pesticide residues in soils from vegetable production areas: A case study in S-Nepal

机译:蔬菜生产区土壤中农药残留的生态风险评估 - 以S尼泊尔为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Pesticides pose a serious risk to ecosystems. In this study, we used European Food Safety Authority methods, such as risk quotient (RQ) and toxicity exposure ratios (TER), to assess the potential ecological risks of 15 pesticide residues detected in agricultural soils in the Gaidahawa Rural Municipality of Nepal. The mean and maximum concentrations of the detected pesticide residues in the soil were used for risk characterization related to soil organisms. RQ_(mean). TER_(mean) and RQ_(maximum). TER_(maximum) were used to determine general and the worst-case scenarios, respectively. Of all the detected pesticides in soils, the no observed effect concentration (NOEC) for 27% of the pesticides was not available in literature for the tested soil organisms and their TER and RQ could not be calculated. RQ threshold value of ≥1 indicates high risk for organisms. Similarly, TER threshold value of ≥5, which is acceptable trigger point value for chronic exposure, indicates an acceptable risk. The results showed that the worst-case scenario (RQ_(maximum)) indicated a high risk for soil organisms from chlorpyrifos [RQ_(maximum)> 9 at depths (cm) of 0-5,15-20 and 35-40 soil layer]; imidadoprid (1.78 in the 35-40 cm soil layer) and profenofos (3.37 in the 0-5 cm and 1.09 in the 35-40 cm soil layer). Likewise, for all the soil depths, the calculated TER for both the general and worst-case scenarios for chlorpyrifos ranged from 0.37 to 3.22, indicating chronic toxicity to F. Candida. Furthermore, the risk of organophosphate pesticides for soil organisms in the sampling sites was mainly due to chlorpyrifos, except for two study sites where the risk was from profenofos. Ecological risk assessment (EcoRA) of the pesticide use in the study area indicated that the EFSA soil organisms were at risk at some of the localities where farmers practiced conventional farming.
机译:杀虫剂对生态系统构成了严重的风险。在这项研究中,我们使用欧洲食品安全机构方法,例如风险商(RQ)和毒性曝光比(TER),以评估尼泊尔市吉拉达农村市农业土壤中检测到15种农药残留的潜在生态风险。土壤中检测到的农药残留的平均值和最大浓度用于与土壤生物有关的风险表征。 rq_(平均值)。 TER_(均值)和RQ_(最大值)。 Ter_(最大值)分别用于确定一般和最坏情况场景。在土壤中的所有检测到的农药中,没有观察到的效应浓度(NoEC)对于测试的土壤生物的文献中没有任何农药,并且无法计算它们的TER和RQ。 ≥1的阈值阈值表明生物体的高风险。类似地,TER阈值≥5,这是慢性曝光的可接受的触发点值,表明了可接受的风险。结果表明,最坏情况(RQ_(最大))表明来自氯吡啶(最大)> 9的土壤生物在0-5,15-20和35-40土层的深度(mcm)中的土壤生物风险高];咪酰胺(1.78在35-40厘米的土壤层中)和Profenofos(35-40厘米土层中的0-5厘米和1.09中的3.37)。同样地,对于所有土壤深度,计算的TER用于紫外线的一般和最差情况场景的范围为0.37至3.22,表明对F. Candida的慢性毒性。此外,在取样部位中对土壤生物体的有机磷农药的风险主要是由于氯吡啶,除了来自促进促进人的两项研究网站。研究区的农药使用的生态风险评估(EcoRA)表明EFSA土壤生物在农民实践常规农业的一些地方受到风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science of the total environment》 |2021年第20期|147921.1-147921.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Soil Physics and Land Management (SLM) Wageningen University and Research the Netherlands Progressive Sustainable Developers Nepal (PSD-Nepal) P.O. Box 23883 Kathmandu 31 Nepal;

    School of Forestry and Natural Resource Management Institute of Forestry (IOF) Tribhuvan University (TU) Kathmandu Nepal;

    Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX) Masaryk University Czech Republic;

    Soil Physics and Land Management (SLM) Wageningen University and Research the Netherlands College of Natural Resources and Environment Northwest A&F University 712100 Yangling China;

    Soil Physics and Land Management (SLM) Wageningen University and Research the Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Pesticides; Ecological risk; Soil organisms; Ecotoxicity;

    机译:杀虫剂;生态风险;土壤生物;生态毒性;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号