首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Does high risk mean high loss: Evidence from flood disaster in southern China
【24h】

Does high risk mean high loss: Evidence from flood disaster in southern China

机译:高风险意味着高损失:中国南方洪涝灾害的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Southern China has suffered from flood disasters for over sixty years, which results in tremendous socio-economic loss. With the development of economy and the improvement of disaster reduction, both the exposure and potential loss of flood disaster are increasing. However, previous studies only focus on risk assessment few has examined the comparison of potential risk and the actual losses caused by it. To this end, a method combing entropy weight and TOPSIS based on flood data (2008 to 2018) in China's national and provincial disaster database is applied to analysis flood risk and resulting loss in southern China. By using disaster system dimensions of hazard, exposure and vulnerability, the effect of natural, economic and social factors on flood risk are also examined. Results indicate that: (1) flood risk in southern China is relatively low from 2008 to 2014 and becomes severe since 2016; (2) the resulting losses of flood disasters in southern China are optimistic during most of the selected years in the study period; (3) flood risk is not always in line with the resulting loss; and (4) flood disasters in southern China are categorized into high-risk and low-loss situation, low-risk and high-loss situation, and the situation with the same level of risk and loss. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess southern China on a regional scale from both temporal and spatial perspectives, and has compensated for the lack of comparative research on flood risk and the resulting loss. In practice, our findings can protrude the priorities of flood prevention both in flood-prone areas and specific measures, which is conducive to improve the efficiency of resource allocation.
机译:中国南方遭遇了超过六十年的洪水灾害,这导致了巨大的社会经济损失。随着经济的发展和减灾的提高,洪水灾害的暴露和潜在损失都在增加。然而,以前的研究只关注风险评估很少已经审查了潜在风险的比较和由其造成的实际损失。为此,基于中国国家和省级灾难数据库(2008年至2018年)梳理熵权和Topsis的方法,应用于分析洪水风险和中国南方的亏损。通过使用灾害系统的危险,暴露和脆弱性,还检查了自然,经济和社会因素对洪水风险的影响。结果表明:(1)中国南部的洪水风险从2008年到2014年相对较低,自2016年以来变得严重; (2)中国南方洪水灾害损失在研究期的大多数所选年份持乐观态度; (3)洪水风险并不总是符合由此产生的损失; (4)中国南方的洪水灾害分为高风险和低损耗情况,低风险和高损失情况,风险和损失水平的情况。据我们所知,这是第一项从时间和空间观点评估中国南方南方的研究,并补偿了对洪水风险的比较研究缺乏和所造成的损失。在实践中,我们的研究结果可以在普通地区和具体措施中突出防洪的优先事项,这有利于提高资源分配效率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science of the total environment》 |2021年第1期|147127.1-147127.9|共9页
  • 作者

    Yangyang Chen; Jimei Li; An Chen;

  • 作者单位

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 PR China Institutes of Science and Development Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 PR China;

    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 PR China Institutes of Science and Development Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 PR China Beijing Municipal Institute of Labor Protection Beijing 100032 PR China;

    Institutes of Science and Development Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100190 PR China No.15 ZhongGuanCun BeiYiTiao 100 190 Beijing China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Flood disaster; Risk and loss; Risk assessment; Comparative analysis;

    机译:洪水灾难;风险和损失;风险评估;对比分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号