首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Pristine and iron-engineered animal- and plant-derived biochars enhanced bacterial abundance and immobilized arsenic and lead in a contaminated soil
【24h】

Pristine and iron-engineered animal- and plant-derived biochars enhanced bacterial abundance and immobilized arsenic and lead in a contaminated soil

机译:原始和铁工程动物和植物衍生的生物脉,增强细菌丰度和固定的砷,并在污染的土壤中引发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, typical animal- and plant-derived biochars derived from pig carcass (PB) and green waste (GWB), and their iron-engineered products (Fe-PB and Fe-GWB) were added at the dose of 3% (w/w) to an acidic (pH = 5.8) soil, and incubated to test their efficacy in improving soil quality and immobilizing arsenic (As =141.3 mg kg~(-1)) and lead (Pb = 736.2 mg kg~(-1)). Soil properties, microbial activities, and the geochemical fractions and potential availabilities of As and Pb were determined in the non-treated (control) and biochar-treated soil. Modification of PB (pH = 10.6) and GWB (pH = 9.3) with Fe caused a decrease in their pH to 4.4 and 3.4, respectively. The application of PB and GWB significantly increased soil pH, while Fe-PB and Fe-GWB decreased soil pH, as compared to the control. Application of Fe-GWB and Fe-PB decreased the NH_4H_2PO_4-extractable As by 32.8 and 35.9%. which was more effective than addition of GWB and PB. However, PB and GWB were more effective than Fe-PB and Fe-GWB in Pb immobilization. Compared to the control, the DTPA-extractable Pb decreased by 20.6 and 21.7%, respectively, following PB and GWB application. Both biochars, particularly PB significantly increased the 16S rRNA bacterial gene copy numbers, indicating that biochar amendments enhanced the bacterial abundance, implying an alleviation of As and Pb bio-toxicity to soil bacteria. The results demonstrated that pristine pig carcass and green waste biochars were more effective in immobilizing Pb, while their Fe-engineered biochars were more effective in As immobilization in co-contaminated soils.
机译:在本研究中,在3%的剂量下加入源自猪胴体(Pb)和绿色废物(GWB)和铸铁产品(Fe-Pb和Fe-GWB)的典型的动物和植物衍生的生物脉冲和其铁工程产品(Fe-Pb和Fe-gwb)( w / w)酸性(pH = 5.8)土壤,并孵育,以测试其改善土壤质量和固定砷的功效(AS = 141.3mg kg〜(-1))和铅(Pb = 736.2mg kg〜( - 1))。在未处理(对照)和生物淀粉处理的土壤中测定土壤性质,微生物活性和地球化学级分以及潜在的含量和Pb的潜在可用性。使用Fe的Pb(pH = 10.6)和GWB(pH = 9.3)的修饰分别降低了它们的pH至4.4和3.4。 PB和GWB的应用显着增加了土壤pH,而Fe-Pb和Fe-GWB与对照相比,土壤pH降低。 Fe-GWB和Fe-Pb的应用降低了NH_4H_2PO_4-可提取的32.8和35.9%。这比添加GWB和Pb更有效。然而,Pb和GWB比PB固定化的Fe-Pb和Fe-GWB更有效。与对照相比,DTPA可提取的PB分别在PB和GWB应用之后分别降低了20.6%和21.7%。 Biochars,特别是PB的两个rRNA细菌基因拷贝数显着增加,表明生物炭修正增强了细菌丰度,暗示了对土壤细菌的毒性和Pb生物毒性的减轻。结果表明,原始的猪胴体和绿色废物生物谱在固定Pb的过程中更有效,而其Fe-Electored Biochars在共染土中的固定化更有效。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science of the total environment》 |2021年第1期|144218.1-144218.9|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Key Laboratory of Soil Contamination Bioremediation of Zhejiang Province School of Environmental and Resource Sciences Zhejiang A&F University Hangzhou 311300 China;

    Biochar Engineering Technology Research Center of Guangdong Province School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering Foshan University Foshan 528000 China University of Wuppertal School of Architecture and Civil Engineering Institute of Foundation Engineering Water- and Waste-Management Laboratory of Soil- and Groundwater-Management Pauluskirchstrasse 7 42285 Wuppertal Germany;

    Biochar Engineering Technology Research Center of Guangdong Province School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering Foshan University Foshan 528000 China Agronomy College Shenyang Agricultural University Shenyang 110866 China;

    Lancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster LA1 4YQ United Kingdom;

    The Global Centre for Environmental Remediation University of Newcastle Callaghan NSW Australia;

    University of Wuppertal School of Architecture and Civil Engineering Institute of Foundation Engineering Water- and Waste-Management Laboratory of Soil- and Groundwater-Management Pauluskirchstrasse 7 42285 Wuppertal Germany King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Meteorology Environment and Arid Land Agriculture Department of Arid Land Agriculture 21589 Jeddah Saudi Arabia University of Kafrelsheikh Faculty of Agriculture Department of Soil and Water Sciences 33516 Kafr El-Sheikh Egypt;

    State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences Beijing 100012 China;

    School of Engineering Huzhou University Huzhou 313000 China;

    Macau Environmental Research Institute Macau University of Science and Technology Macau 999078 China;

    University of Wuppertal School of Architecture and Civil Engineering Institute of Foundation Engineering Water- and Waste-Management Laboratory of Soil- and Groundwater-Management Pauluskirchstrasse 7 42285 Wuppertal Germany Department of Environment Energy and Geoinformatics Sejong University Seoul 05006 Republic of Korea;

    Key Laboratory of Soil Contamination Bioremediation of Zhejiang Province School of Environmental and Resource Sciences Zhejiang A&F University Hangzhou 311300 China Biochar Engineering Technology Research Center of Guangdong Province School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering Foshan University Foshan 528000 China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Modified biochar; Biomass waste treatment; Heavy metals; Soil remediation; Soil microbial community;

    机译:改进的生物炭;生物质废物处理;重金属;土壤修复;土壤微生物群落;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号