...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Quantitative microbial risk assessment and sensitivity analysis for workers exposed to pathogenic bacterial bioaerosols under various aeration modes in two wastewater treatment plants
【24h】

Quantitative microbial risk assessment and sensitivity analysis for workers exposed to pathogenic bacterial bioaerosols under various aeration modes in two wastewater treatment plants

机译:在两种废水处理厂的各种曝气模式下接触致病细菌生物溶胶的工人的定量微生物风险评估和敏感性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) could emit a large amount of bioaerosols containing pathogenic bacteria. Assessing the health risks of exposure to these bioaerosols by using quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is important to protect workers in WWTPs. However, the relative impacts of the stochastic input variables on the health risks determined in QMRA remain vague. Hence, this study performed a Monte Carlo simulation-based QMRA case study for workers exposing to S. aureus or E. coli bioaerosols and a sensitivity analysis in two WWTPs with various aeration modes. Results showed that when workers equipped without personal protective equipment (PPE) were exposed to S. aureus or E. coli bioaerosol in the two WWTPs, the annual probability of infection considerably exceeded the U.S. EPA benchmark (≤10E-4 pppy), and the disease burden did not satisfy the WHO benchmark (≤10E-6 DALYs pppy) (except exposure to £. coli bioaerosol for disease health risk burden). Nevertheless, the use of PPE effectively reduced the annual infection health risk to an acceptable level and converted the disease health risk burden to a highly acceptable level. Referring to the sensitivity analysis, the contribution of mechanical aeration modes to the variability of the health risks was absolutely dominated in the WWTPs. On the aeration mode that showed high exposure concentration, the three input exposure parameters (exposure time, aerosol ingestion rate, and breathing rate) had a great impact on health risks. The health risks were also prone to being highly influenced by the various choices of the dose-response model and related parameters. Current research systematically delivered new data and a novel perspective on the sensitivity analysis of QMRA. Then, management decisions could be executed by authorities on the basis of the results of this sensitivity analysis to reduce related occupational health risks of workers in WWTPs.
机译:废水处理植物(WWTPS)可以发出大量含有致病细菌的生物溶胶。通过使用定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)评估暴露于这些生物溶胶溶解的健康风险非常重要,可以保护WWTPS的工人。然而,随机输入变量对QMRA中确定的健康风险的相对影响仍然模糊。因此,本研究表演了基于蒙特卡罗模拟的QMRA案例研究,适用于暴露于金黄色葡萄球菌或大肠杆菌生物溶胶的工人和两种WWTPS的敏感性分析,具有各种曝气模式。结果表明,当没有个人防护设备(PPE)的工人在两种WWTPS中暴露于金黄色葡萄球菌或大肠杆菌生物溶胶时,感染的年度概率大大超过了美国EPA基准(≤10E-4 PPPY),以及疾病负担不满足世界卫生组织的基准(≤10E-6 DaLys PPPy)(除了暴露于£。大肠杆菌生物对疾病健康风险负担)。尽管如此,PPE的使用有效地将年度感染健康风险降低到可接受的水平,并将疾病健康风险负担转化为高度可接受的水平。参考敏感性分析,机械通气模式对健康风险变异的贡献绝对是在WWTPS中的主导。在显示出高曝光浓度的曝气模式下,三个输入曝光参数(暴露时间,气溶胶摄入率和呼吸率)对健康风险产生了很大的影响。健康风险也容易受到剂量 - 响应模型和相关参数各种选择的高度影响。目前的研究系统地提供了新数据和新的QMRA敏感性分析的新型视角。然后,管理决定可以根据这一敏感性分析的结果,以减少WWTPS中工人的相关职业健康风险的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号