...
首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Effects of indoor activities and outdoor penetration on PM_(2.5) and associated organic/elemental carbon at residential homes in four Chinese cities during winter
【24h】

Effects of indoor activities and outdoor penetration on PM_(2.5) and associated organic/elemental carbon at residential homes in four Chinese cities during winter

机译:室内活动与室外渗透对冬季四个中国城市住宅家庭的PM_(2.5)和相关有机/元素碳的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is increasing public attention on exposure to PM_(2.5) and its related health impacts. It is essential to study the pollution levels, sources, and health implications of indoor PM_(2.5), especially for residential homes, as people tend to spend most of their time indoors. The indoor PM_(2.5) mass and organic/elemental carbon (OC/EC) during winter and early spring period of 2016-2017 at 68 residential households in four large Chinese cities (i.e. Hong Kong, Guangzhou, Shanghai, and Xi'an) were studied. Average indoor PM_(2.5) varied by two-fold, lowest in Hong Kong (34.0 ± 14.6 μg m~3) and highest in Xi'an (78.7 ± 49.3 μg m~(-3)), with comparable levels for Guangzhou (47.2 ± 5.4 μg m~3) and Shanghai (50.3 ± 17.9 μg m~(-3)). Lowest air exchange rate (AER, 0.8 ± 0.8 h~(-1)) and PM_(2.5) indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratio (0.72 ± 0.23) were found for Xi'an households, indicating the limited influence from indoor sources, while importance of indoor PM_(2.5) sources is signified with the highest PM_(2.5) I/O tatio (1.32 ± 0.43) identified for Shanghai households. For households in four cities, OC and EC accounted for 29.5%-38.5% and 7.5%-8.9% of the indoor PM_(2.5) mass, indicating the significance of carbonaceous aerosols. Larger differences between indoor and outdoor OC (2.6-8.4%) than EC (-2.2-1.5%) indicate the presence of indoor OC sources. Decreasing trends of PM_(2.5) I/O ratio and indoor OC proportion were found as the worsening ambient air quality. On average, 11.8 μg m~(-3) (23.1%) and 3.02 μg m~(-3) (18.7%) higher indoor PM_(2.5) and OC concentrations were identified for households with other indoor combustions (e.g., tobacco smoking, incense burning) compared to those with only cooking activities. For Hong Kong and Shanghai households, increments of 13.2 ug m~(-3) (54.1%) of PM_(2.5) and 4.1 μg m~(-3) (45.4%) of OC were found at households with cooking activities as compared to households with no specific indoor combustion.
机译:在接触PM_(2.5)及其相关的健康影响方面增加了公众注意力。必须研究室内PM_(2.5)的污染水平,来源和健康影响,特别是对于住宅家庭,因为人们倾向于在室内花费大部分时间。室内PM_(2.5)质量和有机/元素碳(OC / EC)在2016-2017次春季和春季期间,在四大中国城市(即香港,广州,上海和西安)研究过。平均室内PM_(2.5)在香港(34.0±14.6μgm〜3)和西安最高(78.7±49.3μgm〜(3)),为广州(48.7±49.3μg)而异。 47.2±5.4μgm〜3)和上海(50.3±17.9μgm〜(-3))。最低的空气汇率(AER,0.8±0.8h〜(-1))和PM_(2.5)为西安户发现室内/室外(I / O)比率(0.72±0.23),表明室内有限的影响消息来源,虽然室内PM_(2.5)源的重要性,用上海家庭确定的最高PM_(2.5)I / O TATIO(1.32±0.43)表示。对于四个城市的家庭,OC和EC占室内PM_(2.5)质量的29.5%-38.5%和7.5%-8.9%,表明碳质气溶胶的意义。室内和室外OC之间的较大差异(2.6-8.4%)比EC(-2.2-1.5%)表示室内OC来源的存在。发现PM_(2.5)I / O比和室内OC比例的降低趋势作为环境空气质量恶化。平均而言,11.8μgm〜(-3)(23.1%)和3.02μgm〜(-3)(18.7%)室内PM_(2.5)和OC浓度被鉴定为具有其他室内燃烧的家庭(例如,烟草吸烟与只有烹饪活动的人相比,香火燃烧。对于香港和上海家庭,在烹饪活动的家庭中发现了13.2 ug m〜(-3)(54.1%)的PM_(2.5)和4.1μgm〜(3.1μg)(45.4%)的增量对没有具体室内燃烧的家庭。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science of the total environment》 |2020年第15期|139684.1-139684.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Horn Hong Kong China;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Horn Hong Kong China;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Horn Hong Kong China;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Horn Hong Kong China;

    Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control (AEMPC) Collaborative Innovation Centre of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CIC-AEET) School of Environmental Science and Engineering Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing 210044 China;

    State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology (SKLLQG) Key Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics Institute of Earth Environment Chinese Academy of Sciences Xi'an 710061 China;

    State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology (SKLLQG) Key Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics Institute of Earth Environment Chinese Academy of Sciences Xi'an 710061 China;

    School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an 710049 China;

    School of Resources and Environmental Engineering East China University of Science and Technology Shanghai 200237 China;

    The Key Lab of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters Ministry of Education School of Environment and Energy South China University of Technology Guangzhou 510006 China;

    Division of Atmospheric Sciences Desert Research Institute Reno NV 89512 USA;

    Division of Atmospheric Sciences Desert Research Institute Reno NV 89512 USA;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hung Horn Hong Kong China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Residence; PM_(2.5) (fine suspended particulate); Carbonaceous aerosols; Indoor combustion; Ambient penetration;

    机译:住宅;PM_(2.5)(细悬浮颗粒);碳质气溶胶;室内燃烧;环境渗透;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号