首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Decision Framework for the environmental management of explosive contaminated land
【24h】

Decision Framework for the environmental management of explosive contaminated land

机译:爆炸性污染土地环境管理的决策框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The environmental risks from explosive manufacturing and testing activities are usually evaluated using a qualitative process such as environmental impact prioritisation as recommended by legislation and guidance. However, standard environmental management system (EMS) guidance rarely provides detailed information on how to objectively assess the significance of the environmental impacts based on a rational scientific evidence. Quantitative exposure and eco-toxicity assessments are frequently used in combination with environmental threshold limit guidelines, but these omit important environmental impacts such as physical damage to land, nuisance and contribution to climate change. These impacts are particularly relevant to the explosives industry where noise nuisance and physical damage are given high priority. In addition, contamination from explosive compositions may comprise mixtures of multiple legacy and new generation explosives such as 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane (RDX), 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT), 5-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-3-one (NTO), 2,4-dinitroanisole (DNAN) and nitroguandine (NQ), which may have combined impacts not captured by conventional eco-toxicity assessments. Further, threshold limits for energetic materials in soil and water have not been established for most nations. Additionally, in the explosive industry wider concerns such as legislative compliance and stakeholder concerns may help to provide a more broadly applicable assessment of environmental impact. Therefore in this study a novel decision framework was developed to integrate empirical data with business risks to enable rational decision making for the environmental management of explosive manufacturing facilities. The application of the framework was illustrated using three case studies from the explosive manufacturing industry to demonstrate how the framework can be used to justify environmental management decision making. By linking the environmental impacts to business risks, we demonstrate that manufacturers are able to assess a wide spectrum of issues that might not be identified in the initial environmental assessment such as non-toxic pollution incidents, breaches in legislation and stakeholder perceptions. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:爆炸性制造和测试活动的环境风险通常根据立法和指导推荐的环境影响优先级等定性过程进行评估。但是,标准的环境管理系统(EMS)指导很少提供有关如何在理性科学证据基于理性的科学证据的客观评估环境影响的重要性的详细信息。定量暴露和生态毒性评估经常与环境阈值极限指南结合使用,但这些省略了对土地,滋扰和对气候变化贡献的物理损害等重要的环境影响。这些影响与爆炸物行业特别相关,其中噪音滋扰和物理损坏得到高优先级。此外,爆炸组合物的污染可包含多种遗留和新一代炸药的混合物,例如1,3,5-三腈-1,3,5-三嗪(RDX),2,4,6-三硝基甲苯(TNT),5 -NITRO-1,2,4-三唑-3-一(NOTO),2,4-二硝基吲哚(DNAN)和硝基(NQ),其可能具有常规生态毒性评估的组合影响。此外,尚未为大多数国家建立土壤和水中能量材料的阈值限制。此外,在爆炸性行业中,立法合规和利益相关者担忧的更广泛的关切可能有助于为对环境影响的更广泛适用的评估提供帮助。因此,在这项研究中,开发了一种新的决策框架,以将经验数据与业务风险集成,以便为爆炸制造设施的环境管理启用合理的决策。使用来自爆炸制造业的三个案例研究说明了该框架的应用,以证明框架如何用于证明环境管理决策。通过将环境影响与业务风险联系起来,我们证明制造商能够评估在初始环境评估中可能无法确定的广泛问题,例如无毒污染事件,违反立法和利益攸关方的看法。 (c)2019 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号