首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways
【24h】

Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways

机译:利用高通量筛选数据和不良结果途径优先考虑大湖支流的生态关怀化学品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chemical monitoring data were collected in surface waters from 57 Great Lakes tributaries from 2010 to 13 to identify chemicals of potential biological relevance and sites at which these chemicals occur. Traditional water-quality benchmarks for aquatic life based on in vivo toxicity data were available for 34 of 67 evaluated chemicals. To expand evaluation of potential biological effects, measured chemical concentrations were compared to chemical-specific biological activities determined in high-throughput (ToxCast) in vitro assays. Resulting exposure-activity ratios (EARs) were used to prioritize the chemicals of greatest potential concern: 4 nonylphenol, bisphenol A, metolachlor, atrazine, DEET, caffeine, tris(2 butoxyethyl) phosphate, tributyl phosphate, triphenyl phosphate, benzo(a)pyrene, Iluoranthene, and benzophenone. Water-quality benchmarks were unavailable for five of these chemicals, but for the remaining seven, EAR-based prioritization was consistent with that based on toxicity quotients calculated from benchmarks. Water-quality benchmarks identified three additional PAHs (anthracene, phenanthrene, and pyrene) not prioritized using EARs. Through this analysis, an EAR of 10(-3) was identified as a reasonable threshold above which a chemical might be of potential concern. To better understand apical hazards potentially associated with biological activities captured in ToxCast assays, in vitro bioactivity data were matched with available adverse outcome pathway (AOP) information. The 49 ToxCast assays prioritized via EAR analysis aligned with 23 potentially-relevant AOPs present in the AOP-Wiki. Mixture effects at monitored sites were estimated by summation of EAR values for multiple chemicals by individual assay or individual AOP. Commonly predicted adverse outcomes included impacts on reproduction and mitochondrial function. The EAR approach provided a screening-level assessment for evidence-based prioritization of chemicals and sites with potential for adverse biological effects. The approach aids prioritization of future monitoring activities and provides testable hypotheses to help focus those efforts. This also expands the fraction of detected chemicals for which biologically-based benchmark concentrations are available to help contextualize chemical monitoring results. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:从2010年至13日从57个大湖支流的地表水域收集化学监测数据,以鉴定这些化学品发生的潜在生物相关性和景点的化学品。基于体内毒性数据的水生寿命的传统水质基准可用于34个评估化学品中的34个。为了扩大潜在的生物效应评估,将测量的化学浓度与在体外测定中高通量(ToxCast)中测定的化学特异性生物活性进行比较。产生的暴露 - 活性比(耳朵)用于优先考虑最大潜在问题的化学品:4个壬基酚,双酚A,亚甲磺酸,尿嘧啶,咖啡因,三(2丁氧基乙基)磷酸盐,磷酸三丁基酯,磷酸三苯基,苯甲酸苯(a)芘,伊洛兰和二苯甲酮。这些化学品中的五种水质基准对于其中的五种,但对于剩下的七个,耳基优先级始终与基于基准计算的毒性版本一致。水质基准测试鉴定了未使用耳朵优先考虑的三种额外的PAHS(蒽,菲苯乙烯和芘)。通过该分析,将10(-3)的耳朵被鉴定为上述合理阈值,化学物质可能具有潜在的担忧。为了更好地了解潜在地与在毒品测定中捕获的生物活性相关的顶端危害,体外生物活性数据与可用的不良结果途径(AOP)信息匹配。通过耳分析优先考虑的49个Toxcast测定与AOP-Wiki中存在的23个潜在相关的AOP对齐。通过单个测定或单独的AOP对多种化学品的耳值总结估计监测位点的混合物效果。通常预测的不良结果包括对繁殖和线粒体功能的影响。耳朵方法提供了用于基于证据的化学品和遗址的筛选水平评估,具有不利生物效应的潜力。该方法有助于未来监测活动的优先顺序,并提供可测试的假设,以帮助重点关注这些努力。这也扩展了检测到的化学物质的分数,用于有助于帮助上下文化化学监测结果。由elsevier b.v出版。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号