...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways
【24h】

Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways

机译:使用高通量筛选数据和不利结果途径,对大湖支流中具有生态意义的化学品进行优先排序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Chemical monitoring data were collected in surface waters from 57 Great Lakes tributaries from 2010 to 13 to identify chemicals of potential biological relevance and sites at which these chemicals occur. Traditional water-quality benchmarks for aquatic life based on in vivo toxicity data were available for 34 of 67 evaluated chemicals. To expand evaluation of potential biological effects, measured chemical concentrations were compared to chemical-specific biological activities determined in high-throughput (ToxCast) in vitro assays. Resulting exposure-activity ratios (EARs) were used to prioritize the chemicals of greatest potential concern: 4 nonylphenol, bisphenol A, metolachlor, atrazine, DEET, caffeine, tris(2 butoxyethyl) phosphate, tributyl phosphate, triphenyl phosphate, benzo(a)pyrene, Iluoranthene, and benzophenone. Water-quality benchmarks were unavailable for five of these chemicals, but for the remaining seven, EAR-based prioritization was consistent with that based on toxicity quotients calculated from benchmarks. Water-quality benchmarks identified three additional PAHs (anthracene, phenanthrene, and pyrene) not prioritized using EARs. Through this analysis, an EAR of 10(-3) was identified as a reasonable threshold above which a chemical might be of potential concern. To better understand apical hazards potentially associated with biological activities captured in ToxCast assays, in vitro bioactivity data were matched with available adverse outcome pathway (AOP) information. The 49 ToxCast assays prioritized via EAR analysis aligned with 23 potentially-relevant AOPs present in the AOP-Wiki. Mixture effects at monitored sites were estimated by summation of EAR values for multiple chemicals by individual assay or individual AOP. Commonly predicted adverse outcomes included impacts on reproduction and mitochondrial function. The EAR approach provided a screening-level assessment for evidence-based prioritization of chemicals and sites with potential for adverse biological effects. The approach aids prioritization of future monitoring activities and provides testable hypotheses to help focus those efforts. This also expands the fraction of detected chemicals for which biologically-based benchmark concentrations are available to help contextualize chemical monitoring results. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:从2010年到13年,在大湖区57个支流的地表水中收集了化学监测数据,以识别具有潜在生物相关性的化学物质以及这些化学物的发生地点。基于体内毒性数据的传统水生水质基准可用于67种评估化学品中的34种。为了扩大对潜在生物学效应的评估,将测得的化学浓度与在高通量(ToxCast)体外测定法中确定的化学特异性生物活性进行了比较。使用所得的暴露-活性比(EARs)来优先考虑最可能引起关注的化学品:4壬基酚,双酚A,异丙甲草胺,at去津,DEET,咖啡因,磷酸三(2-丁氧基乙基)酯,磷酸三丁酯,磷酸三苯酯,苯并(a) Il,二茂铁和二苯甲酮。这些化学品中有五种没有水质基准,但是对于其余七种,基于EAR的优先排序与基于基准计算的毒性商的优先级一致。水质基准确定了没有优先使用EAR的另外三种PAH(蒽,菲和pyr)。通过该分析,将EAR的10(-3)确定为合理的阈值,在该阈值之上可能是潜在的化学物质。为了更好地了解可能与ToxCast分析中捕获的生物活性相关的根尖危害,将体外生物活性数据与可用的不良结局途径(AOP)信息进行匹配。通过EAR分析确定的49种ToxCast分析的优先级与AOP-Wiki中存在的23种潜在相关的AOP保持一致。通过单独的测定法或单独的AOP对多种化学物质的EAR值求和,可以估算出受监测部位的混合物效应。通常预测的不良后果包括对生殖和线粒体功能的影响。 EAR方法提供了筛选级别的评估,用于对有潜在不良生物影响的化学品和场所进行循证优先排序。该方法有助于确定未来监视活动的优先级,并提供可验证的假设以帮助集中精力进行这些工作。这也扩大了可检测到的化学成分的比例,对于这些化学成分,可以使用基于生物学的基准浓度来帮助关联化学监测结果。由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号