...
首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Can control of soil erosion mitigate water pollution by sediments?
【24h】

Can control of soil erosion mitigate water pollution by sediments?

机译:控制土壤侵蚀能否减轻沉积物对水的污染?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The detrimental impact of sediment and associated pollutants on water quality is widely acknowledged, with many watercourses in the UK failing to meet the standard of 'good ecological status'. Catchment sediment budgets show that hill slope erosion processes can be significant sources of waterborne sediment, with rates of erosion likely to increase given predicted future weather patterns. However, linking on-site erosion rates with off-site impacts is complicated because of the limited data on soil erosion rates in the UK and the dynamic nature of the source-pathway-receptor continuum over space and time. Even so, soil erosion control measures are designed to reduce sediment production (source) and mobilisation/transport (pathway) on hill slopes, with consequent mitigation of pollution incidents in watercourses (receptors). The purpose of this paper is to review the scientific evidence of the effectiveness of erosion control measures used in the UK to reduce sediment loads of hill slope origin in watercourses. Although over 73 soil erosion mitigation measures have been identified from the literature, empirical data on erosion control effectiveness are limited. Baseline comparisons for the 18 measures where data do exist reveal erosion control effectiveness is highly variable over time and between study locations. Given the limitations of the evidence base in terms of geographical coverage and duration of monitoring, performance of the different measures cannot be extrapolated to other areas. This uncertainty in effectiveness has implications for implementing erosion/sediment risk reduction policies, where quantified targets are stipulated, as is the case in the EU Freshwater Fish and draft Soil Framework Directives. Also, demonstrating technical effectiveness of erosion control measures alone will not encourage uptake by land managers: quantifying the costs and benefits of adopting erosion mitigation is equally important, but these are uncertain and difficult to express in monetary terms.
机译:沉积物和相关污染物对水质的有害影响已得到广泛认可,英国的许多水道均未达到“良好生态状态”的标准。汇水区沉积物预算显示,山坡侵蚀过程可能是水性沉积物的重要来源,考虑到预计的未来天气模式,侵蚀率可能会增加。但是,由于英国土壤侵蚀率的数据有限,并且源-途径-受体连续体在空间和时间上具有动态性质,因此将现场侵蚀率与场外影响联系起来非常复杂。即便如此,水土流失控制措施仍旨在减少山坡上的泥沙产生(源)和动员/运输(通路),从而减轻水道(受体)中的污染事件。本文的目的是回顾科学证据,证明英国采用的侵蚀控制措施可有效减少河道坡面泥沙的沉积。尽管从文献中已经确定了73种减轻土壤侵蚀的措施,但是关于侵蚀控制有效性的经验数据仍然有限。对存在数据的18种措施进行的基线比较显示,侵蚀控制效果随时间推移以及研究地点之间的差异很大。考虑到证据基础在地理覆盖范围和监测持续时间方面的局限性,不同措施的执行情况无法推断到其他领域。这种有效性的不确定性对实施减少侵蚀/沉积物风险的政策有影响,该政策规定了量化的目标,例如欧盟淡水鱼和土壤框架指令草案就是这种情况。同样,仅展示侵蚀控制措施的技术有效性并不能鼓励土地管理者采用:量化采用侵蚀缓解措施的成本和收益同样重要,但是这些不确定性和货币价值难以表达。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号