...
首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >White paper on the promotion of an integrated risk assessment concept in European regulatory frameworks for chemicals
【24h】

White paper on the promotion of an integrated risk assessment concept in European regulatory frameworks for chemicals

机译:关于在欧洲化学品监管框架中促进综合风险评估概念的白皮书

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The vision of a sustainable and safe use of chemicals to protect human health, preserve the environment and maintain the ecosystem requires innovative and more holistic approaches to risk assessment (RA) in order to better inform decision making. Integrated risk assessment (IRA) has been proposed as a solution to current scientific, societal and policy needs. It is defined as the mutual exploitation of environmental risk assessment (ERA) for human health risk assessment (HHRA) and vice versa in order to coherently and more efficiently characterize an overall risk to humans and the environment for better informing the risk analysis process. Extrapolating between species which are relevant for HHRA and ERA requires a detailed understanding of pathways of toxicity/modes of action (MoA) for the various toxicological endpoints. Significant scientific advances, changes in chemical legislation, and increasing environmental consciousness have created a favourable scientific and regulatory environment to develop and promote the concept and vision of IRA. An initial proof of concept is needed to foster the incorporation of IRA approaches into different chemical sectorial regulations and demonstrate their reliability for regulatory purposes. More familiarity and confidence with IRA will ultimately contribute to an overall reduction in in vivo toxicity testing requirements. However, significant progress will only be made if long-term support for MoA-related research is secured. In the short term, further exchange and harmonization of RA terminology, models and methodologies across chemical categories and regulatory agencies will support these efforts. Since societal values, public perceptions and cultural factors are of increasing importance for the acceptance of risk analysis and successful implementation of risk mitigation measures, the integration of socio-economic analysis and socio-behavioural considerations into the risk analysis process may help to produce a more effective risk evaluation and consideration of the risks and benefits associated with the use of chemicals.
机译:为了可持续,安全地使用化学品来保护人类健康,保护环境和维持生态系统,需要创新且更全面的风险评估(RA)方法,以便更好地为决策​​提供依据。提出了综合风险评估(IRA)作为解决当前科学,社会和政策需求的解决方案。它被定义为对人类健康风险评估(HHRA)的环境风险评估(ERA)的相互利用,反之亦然,目的是一致和更有效地表征对人类和环境的总体风险,以便更好地为风险分析过程提供信息。在与HHRA和ERA相关的物种之间进行推断需要详细了解各种毒理学终点的毒性/作用方式(MoA)途径。重大的科学进步,化学法规的变化以及对环境意识的增强,为发展和推广IRA的概念和愿景创造了良好的科学和监管环境。需要初步的概念证明,以促进将IRA方法纳入不同的化学行业法规,并证明其在法规方面的可靠性。对IRA的更多了解和信心最终将有助于总体上降低体内毒性测试的要求。但是,只有获得对MoA相关研究的长期支持,才能取得重大进展。在短期内,跨化学类别和监管机构的RA术语,模型和方法的进一步交换和统一将支持这些努力。由于社会价值,公众观念和文化因素对于接受风险分析和成功实施风险缓解措施越来越重要,因此将社会经济分析和社会行为考虑因素纳入风险分析过程可能有助于产生更多的信息。有效的风险评估,并考虑与使用化学品有关的风险和收益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science of the total environment》 |2015年第15期|211-218|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 61, 4055 Basel, Switzerland;

    Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT), University of Basel, Switzerland;

    Swiss Centre for Applied Human Toxicology (SCAHT), University of Basel, Switzerland;

    Faust & Backhaus Environmental Consulting GbR (F+B), Bremen, Germany;

    Department of Pesticides Control & Phytopharmacy, Benaki Phytopathological Institute (BPI), Athens, Greece;

    OPERA Research Center, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (UCSC), Piacenza, Italy;

    Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart (UCSC), Piacenza, Italy;

    Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, Spanish Council of Scientific Research (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain;

    French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks (INERIS), Parc Technologique Alata, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France;

    UFZ Department of Ecological Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany;

    UFZ Department of Ecological Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany Institute for Organic Chemistry, Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Human health risk assessment; Environmental risk assessment; Integrated risk assessment; Regulatory framework; Chemicals;

    机译:人体健康风险评估;环境风险评估;综合风险评估;监管框架;化学制品;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号