...
首页> 外文期刊>Science of the total environment >Variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric PM_(2.5) during winter haze period around 2014 Chinese Spring Festival at Nanjing: Insights of source changes, air mass direction and firework particle injection
【24h】

Variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric PM_(2.5) during winter haze period around 2014 Chinese Spring Festival at Nanjing: Insights of source changes, air mass direction and firework particle injection

机译:2014年南京春节前后冬季烟霾期间大气PM_(2.5)中多环芳烃的变化:来源变化,空气质量方向和烟火颗粒注入的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Daily PM_(2.5) samples were collected at a suburban site of Nanjing around 2014 Chinese Spring Festival (SF) and analyzed for 18 kinds of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by GC-MS. Comparison of PAH concentrations during different periods, with different air mass origins and under different pollution situations was done. Sources were analyzed by diagnostics ratios and principal component analysis (PCA). The threat of PAHs was assessed by BaP equivalent concentrations (BaPeq) and incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR). The averaged PAHs for pre-SF, SF and after SF periods were 50.6, 17.2 and 29 ng m~(-3), indicating the variations of PAH sources, with reduced traffic, industrial and construction activities during SF and gradually re-starting of them after-SF. According to PAH mass concentrations, their relative abundance to particles, ratio of PAHs (3-ring + 4-ring)/ PAHs(5-ring + 6-ring), mass concentrations of combustion-derived and carcinogenic PAHs, fireworks burning is an important source for PAHs during SF. The ILCR values for Chinese New Year day were 0.68 and 3.3 per 100,000 exposed children and adults. It suggested the necessity of controlling fireworks burning during Chinese SF period which was always companied with serious regional haze pollution. PAH concentrations exhibited decreasing trend when air masses coming from the following directions as North China Plain (63.9 ng m~(-3)) > Central China (53.0 ng m~(-3)) > Shandong Peninsula (46.6 ng m~(-3)) > Northwest China (18.8 ng m~(-3)) > Sea (15.8 ng m~(-3)). For different pollution situations, they decreased as haze (44.5 ng m~(-3)) > fog-haze (28.4 ng m~(-3)) > clear (12.2 ng m~(-3)) > fog day (9.2 ng m~(-3)). Coal combustion, traffic emission, industrial processes and petroleum (only for non-SF holiday periodss) were the main sources of PM_(2.5) associated PAHs. Fireworks burning contributed 14.0% of PAHs during SF period. Directly measurement of PAHs from fireworks burning is urgently needed for source apportionment studies in the future.
机译:2014年春节前后,南京郊区每天采集PM_(2.5)样品,并通过GC-MS分析18种多环芳烃(PAHs)。比较了不同时期,不同空气质量起源和不同污染情况下的PAH浓度。通过诊断比率和主成分分析(PCA)对来源进行分析。 PAH的威胁通过BaP当量浓度(BaPeq)和终生癌症风险增量(ILCR)进行评估。 SF前,SF以及SF之后的平均PAH分别为50.6、17.2和29 ng m〜(-3),表明PAH来源的变化,SF期间的交通,工业和建筑活动减少,并逐渐重启。他们后SF。根据PAH的质量浓度,它们对颗粒的相对丰度,PAHs(3环+ 4环)/ PAHs(5环+ 6环)的比例,燃烧和致癌的PAH的质量浓度,烟火燃烧是SF期间PAH的重要来源。农历新年的ILCR值分别为每100,000受感染的儿童和成人0.68和3.3。这表明在中国SF时期控制烟花燃烧的必要性总是伴随着严重的区域烟霾污染。当华北平原(63.9 ng m〜(-3))>华中(53.0 ng m〜(-3))>山东半岛(46.6 ng m〜(-) 3))>中国西北(18.8 ng m〜(-3))>海(15.8 ng m〜(-3))。对于不同的污染情况,它们以雾度(44.5 ng m〜(-3))>雾霾(28.4 ng m〜(-3))>晴(12.2 ng m〜(-3))>雾天(9.2)降低。 ng m〜(-3))。煤炭燃烧,交通排放,工业过程和石油(仅针对非SF假期)是PM_(2.5)相关PAH的主要来源。 SF期间,烟花燃烧占PAH的14.0%。将来,迫切需要直接测量烟花燃烧产生的多环芳烃,以进行源分配研究。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science of the total environment》 |2015年第1期|59-72|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Collage of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Ningliu Road 219, Nanjing, China;

    Collage of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;

    Collage of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;

    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Collage of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Ningliu Road 219, Nanjing, China;

    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Collage of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;

    Collage of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;

    Collage of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;

    Collage of Atmospheric Physics, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;

    Collage of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 100086, China,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Ningliu Road 219, Nanjing, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    PM_(2.5); Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Haze; Firework burning; Source identification; Health risk;

    机译:PM_(2.5);多环芳烃;阴霾;烟花燃烧;来源识别;健康风险;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号