...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Sustainability assessment of alternative end-uses for disused areas based on multi-criteria decision-making method
【24h】

Sustainability assessment of alternative end-uses for disused areas based on multi-criteria decision-making method

机译:基于多准则决策方法的废弃区替代最终用途可持续性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The main aim of this study was to define and apply a multidisciplinary and multi-criteria approach to sustainability in evaluating alternative end-uses for disused areas. Taking into account the three pillars of sustainability (social, economic and environmental dimension) as well as the need for stakeholders to have new practical instruments, the innovative approach consists of four modules stated (i) sociological, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental and (iv) multi-criteria assessment. By means of a case study on a small Municipality in Southern Italy, three end-uses alternatives, representing three essential services for citizens, were selected: Municipal gym; Market area; Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) separate collection centre. The sociological module was useful to select the most socially sound alternative by means of a consultative referendum, simulated with the use of a structured questionnaire administered to a sample of the population. The economic evaluation was conducted defining the bill of quantities with regarding to six main items (soil handling, landfill disposal tax, public services, structure and services, completion work, equipment and furnishings). The environmental evaluation was performed applying the Delphi method with local technicians who were involved in a qualitative-quantitative evaluation of the three alternatives with regarding to eight possible environmental impacts (landscape impact, soil handling, odour, traffic, noise, atmospheric pollution, wastewater, waste). Finally, the Simple Additive Weighting was used as multi-criteria technique to define alternatives priorities. The obtained results showed how the multi-criteria analysis is a useful decision support tool able to identify transparently and efficiently the most sustainable solutions to a complex social problem.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是定义和应用多学科和多准则的可持续性方法来评估废弃区域的替代最终用途。考虑到可持续性的三个支柱(社会,经济和环境方面)以及利益相关者拥有新的实用工具的需要,创新方法包括四个模块,分别是(i)社会学,(ii)经济,(iii)环境和(iv)多标准评估。通过对意大利南部一个小城市的案例研究,选择了三种最终用途替代品,它们代表了为公民提供的三种基本服务:市政体育馆;市场区域;城市固体废物(MSW)的单独收集中心。社会学模块对于通过协商性全民公决来选择最具有社会意义的替代方案非常有用,该公投是通过对人口样本进行的结构化问卷调查来模拟的。进行了经济评估,确定了涉及六个主要项目的数量清单(土壤处理,垃圾填埋处置税,公共服务,结构和服务,完工,设备和家具)。环境评估是使用Delphi方法与当地技术人员一起进行的,他们对三种替代方案进行了定性定量评估,涉及八种可能的环境影响(景观影响,土壤处理,气味,交通,噪声,大气污染,废水,浪费)。最后,简单加法加权用作多准则技术来定义替代优先级。获得的结果表明,多准则分析是一种有用的决策支持工具,能够透明有效地识别复杂社会问题的最可持续解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号