首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Selecting appropriate wastewater treatment technologies using a choosing-by-advantages approach
【24h】

Selecting appropriate wastewater treatment technologies using a choosing-by-advantages approach

机译:使用优势选择方法选择合适的废水处理技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Selecting the most sustainable wastewater treatment (WWT) technology among possible alternatives is a very complex task because the choice must integrate economic, environmental, and social criteria. Traditionally, several multi-criteria decision-making approaches have been applied, with the most often used being the analytical hierarchical process (AHP). However, AHP allows users to offset poor environmental and/or social performance with low cost. To overcome this limitation, our study examines a choosing-by-advantages (CBA) approach to rank seven WWT technologies for secondary WWT. CBA results were compared with results obtained by using the AHP approach. The rankings of WWT alternatives differed, depending on whether the CBA or AHP approach was used, which highlights the importance of the method used to support decision-making processes, particularly ones that rely on subjective interpretations by experts. This paper uses a holistic perspective to demonstrate the benefits of using the CBA approach to support a decision-making process when a group of experts must come to a consensus in selecting the most suitable WWT technology among several available.
机译:在可能的替代方案中选择最可持续的废水处理(WWT)技术是一项非常复杂的任务,因为选择必须结合经济,环境和社会标准。传统上,已经应用了几种多准则决策方法,其中最常用的是层次分析法(AHP)。但是,AHP允许用户以低成本弥补不良的环境和/或社会绩效。为了克服这一限制,我们的研究探讨了一种按优势选择(CBA)方法对二级WWT排名的七种WWT技术。将CBA结果与通过AHP方法获得的结果进行比较。根据是否使用CBA或AHP方法,WWT替代方案的排名有所不同,这凸显了用于支持决策过程的方法的重要性,尤其是那些依赖于专家的主观解释的方法。本文使用整体视角来说明使用CBA方法支持决策过程的好处,当一组专家必须达成共识以在几种可用的WWT技术中选择最合适的WWT技术时,才能达成共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号