...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Identifying non-reference sites to guide stream restoration and long-term monitoring
【24h】

Identifying non-reference sites to guide stream restoration and long-term monitoring

机译:识别非参考站点,以指导河流恢复和长期监测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AbstractThe reference condition paradigm has served as the standard for assessing the outcomes of restoration projects, particularly their success in meeting project objectives. One limitation of relying solely on the reference condition in designing and monitoring restoration projects is that reference conditions do not necessarily elucidate impairments to effective restoration, especially diagnosing the causal mechanisms behind unsuccessful outcomes. We provide a spatial framework to select both reference and non-reference streams to guide restoration planning and long-term monitoring through reliance on anthropogenically altered ecosystems to understand processes that govern ecosystem biophysical properties and ecosystem responses to restoration practices. We then applied the spatial framework to East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC), Tennessee (USA), a system receiving 30years of remediation and pollution abatement actions from industrialization, pollution, and urbanization. Out of >13,000 stream reaches, we identified anywhere from 4 to 48 reaches, depending on the scenario, that could be used in restoration planning and monitoring for specific sites. Preliminary comparison of fish species composition at these sites compared to EFPC sites were used to identify potential mechanisms limiting the ecological recovery following remediation. We suggest that understanding the relative role of anthropogenic pressures in governing ecosystem responses is required to successful, process-driven restoration.Graphical abstractDisplay OmittedHighlightsReference sites have served as a standard to measure ecosystem restoration success but do not elucidate impaired processesComparison of reference sites to bearing sites, i.e. altered ecosystems, help identify constraints to effective restorationA spatial framework and case study are used to identify bearing streams that match biophysical conditions at restored sitesOut of >13,000 stream sites, a subset of bearing sites were prioritized for use in future long-term monitoringBearing streams revealed disrupted processes at play in restored sites and exposed limitations of current reference sites
机译: 摘要 参考条件范式已成为评估恢复项目成果(尤其是其能否成功实现项目目标)的标准。在设计和监视修复项目时仅依靠参考条件的局限性是参考条件不一定能阐明有效恢复的障碍,尤其是诊断结果不成功背后的原因机制时。我们提供了一个空间框架,可以选择参考流和非参考流,以通过依赖人为改变的生态系统来指导恢复计划和长期监测,以了解控制生态系统生物物理特性和生态系统对恢复实践的响应的过程。然后,我们将空间框架应用于美国田纳西州的东叉白杨溪(EFPC),该系统接受了30年的工业化,污染和城市化修复和污染减排行动。在超过13,000个流域中,根据具体情况,我们确定了4到48个流域中的任何一个,可用于恢复计划和特定站点的监视。与EFPC地点相比,将这些地点的鱼类组成进行了初步比较,以确定可能的机制限制了修复后的生态恢复。我们建议,要成功地,由过程驱动的恢复,必须了解人为压力在控制生态系统响应中的相对作用。 图形摘要 省略显示 突出显示 参考网站已成为st衡量生态系统恢复成功的标准,但不能阐明受损的过程 将参考地点与受污染地点(即生态系统发生变化)进行比较,有助于确定有效恢复的制约因素 使用空间框架和案例研究来确定匹配的方位流恢复站点的生物物理条件 在超过13,000个流站点中,优先选择了一个承载站点的子集,以用于将来的长期监视 轴承流显示出恢复站点中的进程正在中断,并且暴露了当前参考站点的局限性

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号