...
首页> 外文期刊>The Science of the Total Environment >Social-ecological innovation in remote mountain areas: Adaptive responses of forest-dependent communities to the challenges of a changing world
【24h】

Social-ecological innovation in remote mountain areas: Adaptive responses of forest-dependent communities to the challenges of a changing world

机译:偏远山区的社会生态创新:依赖森林的社区对瞬息万变的世界的适应性反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To better understand how constantly changing human-environment interactions could be better organized to respond to current challenges, we examined the Ukrainian Carpathians as an example case of complex forest social-ecological systems (FSES). We did it by interviewing diverse and relevant local stakeholder (N = 450). In particular, we strived to: ⅰ) outline how people and nature are linked and interact in coupled FSES; ⅱ) examine the preferences of stakeholders on the forests and associated ecosystem services (ES); ⅲ) map key drivers threatening well-being of FSES and ⅳ) identify potential responses to address the challenges at a local scale. To answer these questions we followed a mixed method route by integrating qualitative (participatory) and quantitative data collection and analyses, with further application of a Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework in combination with the ES approach in order to assess benefits, threats to these benefits, and responses regarding the studied FSES. We found that the key benefit from FSES is timber and non-wood forest products (like berries and mushrooms), but also various regulating services were ranked highly by respondents. To explore social-ecological innovation, with potential responses of forest-dependent communities to challenges they face, we employed a commonly used assumption that governance must fit to the particular characteristics of FSES in order to enable sustainability. For the particular case of the Ukrainian Carpathians, we identified and discussed the following five nonconformities or "misfits" threatening sustainability: 1) Spatial misfit in legislation; 2) Poor contextualization; 3) Trap of the single ES; 4) Participatory misfit; and 5) Robbing the commons. By conceptualizing those key threats, we proposed responses for sustainability. The findings contributed to an advanced understanding of complex FSES, their key challenges and potential solutions in order to secure well-being of people and nature in coupled social-ecological systems, in the conditions of a changing world.
机译:为了更好地理解如何更好地组织不断变化的人与环境的相互作用来应对当前的挑战,我们以乌克兰喀尔巴阡山脉为例,研究了复杂的森林社会生态系统(FSES)。我们通过采访各种相关的当地利益相关者(N = 450)来做到这一点。特别是,我们致力于:ⅰ)概述人与自然如何在耦合的FSES中联系和相互作用; ⅱ)研究利益相关者对森林和相关生态系统服务的偏好; ⅲ)确定威胁FSES福祉的主要驱动因素,ⅳ)确定应对当地挑战的潜在对策。为了回答这些问题,我们采用了混合方法,将定性(参与性)和定量数据收集与分析相结合,并进一步应用了驱动力-压力-状态-冲击-响应(DPSIR)框架与ES方法相结合评估收益,对这些收益的威胁以及对所研究的FSES的反应。我们发现,FSES的主要好处是木材和非木材林产品(如浆果和蘑菇),但受访者对各种监管服务也给予了很高的评价。为了探索社会生态创新,让依赖森林的社区应对他们面临的挑战,我们采用了一种普遍使用的假设,即治理必须适合FSES的特定特征才能实现可持续性。对于乌克兰喀尔巴阡山脉的特殊情况,我们确定并讨论了以下五个威胁可持续性的不合格或“不当行为”:1)空间不适合立法; 2)上下文不足; 3)单个ES的陷阱; 4)参与性不匹配; 5)抢劫公地。通过概念化这些关键威胁,我们提出了可持续性的应对措施。这些发现有助于人们对复杂的FSES,关键挑战和潜在解决方案有更深入的了解,以便在不断变化的世界中确保社会生态系统中人与自然的福祉。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Science of the Total Environment》 |2018年第1期|894-906|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, United Kingdom,Institute of Ecological Economics and Management, Ukrainian National Forestry University, Gen. Chuprynky St. 103, Lviv 79057, Ukraine;

    Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, United Kingdom;

    Institute of Ecological Economics and Management, Ukrainian National Forestry University, Gen. Chuprynky St. 103, Lviv 79057, Ukraine;

    Environmental Network Ltd., The Hillocks, Tarland, Aboyne, AB34 4TJ, Scotland, United Kingdom;

    Cultural Anthropology, PO Box 1000, University of Oulu, 90014, Finland;

    University of Vermont, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, 312C Aiken Center, 81 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, United States,The Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences, 106 Ag. Admin Building, University Park PA 16802-2600, United States;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Forest ecosystem services; Well-being; Multifunctional forestry; Marginalised rural areas; Ukrainian Carpathians;

    机译:森林生态系统服务;福利;多功能林业;边缘化的农村地区;乌克兰喀尔巴阡山脉;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号